Development of the Somatic Stress Response Scale and Its Application in Clinical Practice.
10.3349/ymj.2005.46.5.614
- Author:
Kyung Bong KOH
1
;
Joong Kyu PARK
;
Sunghee CHO
Author Information
1. Department of Psychiatry, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Somatic stress response scale;
reliability;
validity;
anxiety disorders;
depressive disorder;
somatoform disorders
- MeSH:
Stress, Psychological/*diagnosis;
Somatoform Disorders/*psychology;
*Psychiatric Status Rating Scales;
Middle Aged;
Male;
Humans;
Female;
Depressive Disorder/*psychology;
Demography;
Anxiety Disorders/*psychology;
Aged;
Adult
- From:Yonsei Medical Journal
2005;46(5):614-624
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
The objective of this study was to develop the Somatic Stress Response Scale (SSRS), and then to use the scale in clinical practice. A preliminary survey was conducted using 109 healthy adults to obtain somatic stress responses. Then, 215 healthy subjects completed a preliminary questionnaire. A comparison was made regarding the somatic stress responses among 191 patients (71 with anxiety disorders, 73 with depressive disorders and 47 with somatoform disorders) and 215 healthy subjects. Factor analysis of the SSRS yielded five subscales: the cardiorespiratory response, somatic sensitivity, gastrointestinal response, general somatic response and genitourinary response subscales. The test-retest reliability for the five subscales and the total score was significantly high, ranging from .86 to .94. The Cronbach's yen afor the five subscales ranged from .72 to .92, and was .95 for the total score. By correlating the five subscales and the total score of the SSRS with the somatization subscale scores of the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R), convergent validity was calculated. The correlations were all at significant levels. Each of the disorder groups was significantly higher in scores of the cardiorespiratory response, gastrointestinal response, general somatic response and genitourinary response subscale, and in the total SSRS score than the healthy group. Only the depressive disorder group scored significantly higher on the somatic sensitivity subscale than the healthy group, and they also scored significantly higher on the genitourinary response subscale than the anxiety disorder group did. These results suggest that the SSRS is highly reliable and valid, and that it can be effectively utilized as a measure for research of the somatic symptoms related to stress. It also implies that somatic sensitivity and genitourinary responses are associated with depressive disorders.
