Risk Factors for Failure of Nonoperative Treatment for Unilateral Cervical Facet Fractures.
10.4184/asj.2017.11.3.356
- Author:
Carola Francisca VAN ECK
1
;
Mitchell Stephen FOURMAN
;
Amir Mohamad ABTAHI
;
Louis ALARCON
;
William Fielding DONALDSON
;
Joon Yung LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. vaneckcf@upmc.edu
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Cervical spine;
Facet fracture;
Non-displaced;
Nonoperative treatment;
Failure rate
- MeSH:
Body Mass Index;
Classification;
Clinical Study;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Injury Severity Score;
Radiculopathy;
Retrospective Studies;
Risk Factors*;
Spinal Cord Diseases;
Trauma Centers
- From:Asian Spine Journal
2017;11(3):356-364
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine what percentage of patients who underwent nonoperative management of unilateral non-displaced or minimally displaced facet fractures progressed radiographically and to determine what percentage of patients required surgical intervention and to identify risk factors for failure of conservative management. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: According to most commonly used classification systems, unilateral, non-and minimally displaced facet fractures are be amendable to nonoperative management. METHODS: A retrospective review of the Trauma Registry of a Level I trauma center was performed to identify all patients diagnosed with a non- or minimally displaced unilateral facet fracture which was managed nonoperatively. Several demographic variables and clinical outcomes were recorded. Using computed tomography scanning and plain radiographs, fracture pattern, listhesis, displacement, angle and percentage of the facet that included the fracture were determined. Radiographic progression was defined as the occurrence of listhesis of more than 10% of the anterior-posterior dimensions of the inferior vertebral body during radiographic follow-up. Failure of conservative management was defined as a patient requiring surgical intervention after initially being managed nonoperatively. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were included. Fifteen patients (20%) progressed radiographically. However, only 2 developed radicular symptoms and none developed myelopathy or other catastrophic cord related symptoms. Seven patients (9%) underwent surgery. Indications for surgery included significant radiographic progression and/or radicular symptoms. Risk factors for failure of conservative management included presence of radiculopathy at the time of presentation, a higher body mass index, increased Injury Severity Score, greater initial fracture displacement and more than 2 mm of listhesis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with non-displaced or minimally displaced facet fractures who do not have neurological symptoms at the time of presentation can safely be managed conservatively with careful observation and follow-up.
