The effect observation on tension-free herniorrhaphy between anterior and posterior approach in inguinal hernia patients

VernacularTitle:开放式前后入路无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效观察
Author: Pengfei WANG ; Qian ZHU ; Shaoliang HAN ; Naxin LIU ; Guanbao ZHU
Publication Type:Journal Article
Keywords: Inguinal hernia; Herniorrhaphy; Anterior approach; Posterior approach
From:Journal of Endocrine Surgery 2013;7(6):487-490
CountryChina
Language:Chinese
Abstract: Objective To choose the best surgical procedure,the surgical results and clinical outcomes of inguinal hernia repair with either an open anterior or posterior approach,were studied.Methods The 366 cases of inguinal hernia patients according to surgical side approach in different ways,is divided into A,B groups,Among group A of 186 cases repaired with application of prolene hernia system (PHS) via anterior approach,while group B of 180 cases surgically treated with Kugel technique with a posterior approach,and surgical procedure,postoperative recovery and complications were compared between these two groups,respectively.Results No significant differences were found in operation time,hospital stay,incisional infection rate and the recurrence rate (P ＞ 0.05).However,compared with group,the group B patients had less pain of the wound,slight postoperative swelling response,less foreign body aesthesis and hydrocele(P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion Compared with the anterior approach surgery,the posterior approach (Kugel technique) has less traumatic,low complication rate and rapid recovery after operation.