Impact of pancreatic stent as a preventive measure on post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with repeatedly non-selective pancreatic duct cannulation
10.3969/j.issn.1007-1989.2016.12.020
- VernacularTitle:胰管支架置入术对经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中反复胰管导丝插入患者术后胰腺炎的预防作用观察
- Author:
Chaowu CHEN
;
Haihang ZHU
;
Denghao DENG
;
Jun LIU
;
Juan CHEN
;
Weiwei CHEN
;
Zhen ZHU
- Keywords:
endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography;
dififcult intubation;
pancreatic stenting
- From:
China Journal of Endoscopy
2016;22(12):94-96
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the impact of pancreatic duct stenting as a preventive measure for post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with repeatedly non-selective pancreatic duct cannulation.Methods Clinical data of 64 patients with biliary tract disease from January 2008 to December 2015 was prospective analyzed. All the patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group. Patients in observation group received pancreatic stent placement, while patients in control group was not received pancreatic stent placement and nasal duct. Postoperative monitoring items included abdominal pain, blood amylase. Then record and compare the incidence of acute pancreatitis, pancreatitis severity rating, abdominal pain score, Ranson score, amylase recovery time between the two groups.Results Observation group had ifve cases of PEP, the rate was 15.6 %, including mild four cases (12.5 %), medium one case (3.1 %); the control group had 13 cases of PEP, the rate was 40.6 %, including mild six cases (18.8 %), medium four cases (12.5 %), severe three cases (9.4 %). PEP observation group was signiifcantly lower than the control group (P < 0.05). Mild, medium and severe PEP were lower than the control group, in which the severe PEP was signiifcantly lower than the control group (P < 0.05). Ranson score of the observation group was (1.2 ± 0.4), significantly lower than the control group (2.5 ± 1.2) (P < 0.05); the observation group amylase average recovery time was (3.0 ± 0.6) d, it is also signiifcantly lower than the control group (5.8 ± 1.4) d (P < 0.01). No bleeding and perforation complications occurred.Conclusion Pancreatic stenting can effectively prevent the incidence of PEP, reduce postoperative pain, improve patient recovery.
