Comparison of surgical site infection between laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer:A Meta-analysis
10.3969/j.issn.1007-1989.2016.03.010
- VernacularTitle:腹腔镜与开腹远端胃切除术后手术部位感染的Meta分析
- Author:
Xiaojun XUE
;
Kai NIE
;
Jinrong CHEN
;
Song ZHOU
;
Wenhua ZHANG
;
Dafeng CHEN
- Keywords:
laparoscopy;
distal gastrectomy;
gastric cancer;
infection;
Meta-analysis
- From:
China Journal of Endoscopy
2016;22(3):46-50
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the differences of surgical site infection (SSI) between laparoscopic distal gas-trectomy (LDG) and open distal gastrectomy (ODG) for gastric cancer. Methods We set up strict inclusion and ex-clusion criteria. All the randomized controlled trials (RCT) on LDG and ODG for gastric cancer were collected. Meta-analysis was performed according to the recommendation by the Cochrane handbook. Results Six RCTs in-cluding 767 patients were analyzed, who were divided into LDG group (n =394) and ODG group ( n=373). Postop-erative wound infection and SSI were significantly lower in LDG than in ODG [RR=0.32, 95 %Cl (0.11, 0.91).P =0.03; RR= 0.28, 95 %Cl (0.12, 0.70),P =0.006]. There was no significant difference in intra-abdominal abscess between the two groups [RR=0.35, 95 % Cl (0.09, 1.31), P=0.12]. Conclusions LDG was associated with a lower incidence of SSI, especially wound infection, as compared with ODG in the meta-analysis.
