A clinical controlled study of mesh and non-mesh technique in laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernias
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-5232.2017.05.012
- VernacularTitle:食管巨大裂孔疝腹腔镜补片与非补片修补的对比分析
- Author:
Xiangyu SUN
;
Yu WU
;
Hongzhi ZHAO
;
Zhenyu WANG
;
Zhen CHEN
;
Qili DAI
;
Qing WANG
;
Mingfang QIN
- Keywords:
Hernia,hiatal;
Laparoscopic repair;
Mesh
- From:
Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
2017;34(5):350-353
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the safety and effectiveness of mesh and non-mesh techniques in laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernias (LRLHH).Methods A retrospective clinical controlled study of mesh and non-mesh techniques in LRLHH form January 2006 to August 2014 was performed.Results A total of 83 and 36 patients were recruited to mesh and non-mesh group respectively.There were no significant differences in operation time,operation bleeding volume,hospitalization time or complications between the two groups.Main symptoms were significantly improved during the postoperative long-term follow-up in both groups.The improvement of dysphagia in mesh group showed no significant difference [22.9％ (19/83) VS 12.0％ (10/83),P=0.066],however,non-mesh group showed significant difference [30.6％ (11/36) VS 5.6％ (2/36),P=0.006].Rate of dysphagia alleviation in non-mesh group was significantly higher than that in mesh group [25.0％ (9/36) VS 10.8％ (9/83),P =0.048].Mesh-related complications of esophageal erosions occurred in 5 patients (6.0％) in mesh group,including esophageal stenosis in 3 patients,esophageal-cardiac stricture in 1 patient.Recurrent hernia occurred in 1 patient (1.2％) in mesh group and 3 patients (8.3％) in non-mesh group (P =0.082).Conclusion LRLHH with mesh should be individualized.The use of mesh in LRLHH reduces the recurrence rate,but may lead to some complications.
