Comparison between different osteotomy methods for kneeling ability recovery after total knee arthroplasty
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2017.11.004
- VernacularTitle:两种确定股骨外旋截骨的方式对膝关节置换术后患者下蹲功能的影响
- Author:
Yifan HUANG
;
Guodong ZHANG
;
Guohua WANG
;
Lu DING
;
Xin QI
- Keywords:
Arthroplasty,replacement,knee;
Osteotomy;
Range of motion,articular
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2017;37(11):670-675
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical outcomes between two different femur rotating osteotomy methods for kneeling ability recovery after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).Methods From January 2012 to December 2014,88 patients underwent TKA were selected for a retrospective study and were divided into two groups based on the methods to determine femoral rotation.Forty-eight patients were in measured resection group,while 40 patients in gap balancing group.The patients in both groups underwent fixed-bearing tibia prosthesis.There were no statistical significance between the two groups in gender,age,BMI and knee varus angle (P＞0.05).The knee varus angle,ROM,Oxford knee score (OKS) and American Knee Society (KSS) knee score were collected to assess malformation correction,kneeling ability and functions at pre-operation,one and two years postoperatively.Results The operation duration and blood loss in measured resection group were 80±19 min and 348±121 ml,while these data in gap balancing group were 82±23 min and 315 ± 100 ml respectively (P＞0.05).Patients in measured resection group were followed up 24-59 months (mean 43± 11 months),while the followed-up duration in gap balancing group was 25-58 months (mean 47±10 months).No major complications such as infection loosen and instability were occurred.Varus angles in measured resection group at postoperative 1 year and 2 year postoperative were 1.2°±0.4° and 1.0°±0.2° respectively,while those in gap balancing group were 0.9°±0.2° and 0.8°±0.3° (P＞0.05).The scores of the seventh item of OKS in measured resection group at 1 year and 2year follow-ups were 2.79±1.02 and 2.75± 1.03 respectively,while those in the gap balancing group were 1.90±0.85 and 1.80±0.83 (P＜0.01).ROM in the measured resection group at 1 year and 2 year postoperative were 102.08°± 15.60° and 102.08°±15.60° respectively,while those in the gap balancing group were 112.50°±18.32° and 113.00°±18.09° (P＜0.05).KSS in measured resection group at postoperative 1 year and 2 years were 154.63±31.12 and 154.63±31.26 respectively,while those in the gap balancing group were 170.55±22.67 and 173.45±22.52 (P＜0.05).Conclusion The method of measured resection and gap balancing to confirm femoral rotation during TKA can both achieve favorable kneeling ability and clinical outcomes,while gap balancing show superiority on kneeling ability recovery,ROM and clinical outcomes at 2-year postoperative improvement.
