Preliminary study on evaluating volume changes in left atrial remodeling and left ventricular remodeling by three-dimensional echocardiography with automatic quantification
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2017.05.001
- VernacularTitle:三维全自动左心定量技术评价左心房和左心室重构容积变化的初步研究
- Author:
Cheng FENG
;
Ruiqiang GUO
;
Lixin CHEN
;
Jian LI
;
Shilong LIU
;
Jinfeng XU
;
Ying WU
- Keywords:
Echocardiography,real-time three-dimensional;
Ventricular remodeling;
Ventricular function,left;
Atrial function,left
- From:
Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
2017;26(5):369-373
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To discuss the feasibility and reproducibility of left ventricular volume and function of patients with left atrial remodeling and left ventricular remodeling by 3-dimensional echocardiography HeartModel (3D-HM).Methods Three-dimensional images of 156 subjects were collected under HMACQ imaging mode.They were assigned into three groups:① control group (group A,n =70);② group of left ventricular remodeling after,acute myocardial infarction (group B,n =17);③group of hypertension left atrial remodeling (group C,n =69).3D-HM method was used for quantifying left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV),left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV),left atrial end-systolic volume (LAESV) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF),and the results were compared with conventional 3D-manual results.The reproducibility of the 3D-HM method within one group and among different groups was evaluated.Results There was a significant difference in all the parameters measured with the 3D-HM method in different groups(P ＜0.05).LVEDV,LVESV,and LAESV in group B were higher than those in group A and group C(P ＜0.05),and LVEF was lower than that in group A and group C(P ＜0.05),LAESV of group C was higher than that of group A(P ＜0.05).The difference in the measurements of LVEDV and LVESV between the two methods was greatest in group B compared with group C and group A(P ＜0.05).In group C,the measured value difference of LAESV between two methods was greater than that of group A (P =0.03).There was closer correlation among LVEDV,LVESV,LAESV and LVEF measured values of 3D-HM method as well as measured values of the 3D-manual method (r =0.94,0.97,0.91 and 0.90).The data post-processing time of 3D-HM was significantly shorter than that of 3D-manual (P ＜0.05).The inter-observer and intra-observer difference of measured values of 3D-HM method had no statistical significance (P ＞0.05).Conclusions 3D-HM is a fast and feasible technique with high reproducibility for quantifying the left ventricular volume and function in patients with left atrial remodeling and left ventricular remodeling.
