Clinical application of abdominal lifting and compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation method for treatment of patients with cardiac arrest
10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.08.014
- VernacularTitle:腹部提压心肺复苏在心搏骤停患者中的应用
- Author:
Haishan LI
;
Liu JI
;
Jingjing WANG
- Keywords:
Abdominal lifting and compression;
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation;
Cardiac arrest
- From:
Chinese Critical Care Medicine
2017;29(8):744-746
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the clinical application of rhythmic abdominal lifting and compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ALC-CPR) in cardiac arrest (CA) patients with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) contraindication (chest rib fracture, chest trauma, etc.).Methods The clinical data of patients with CA in emergency department of Hefei Second People's Hospital from June 2015 to December 2016 were analyzed retrospectively, and the patients with weights 40-150 kg and CA≤20 minutes, and resuscitated with ALC-CPR were selected. The vital signs and blood gas analysis indexes of patients before resuscitation and 30 minutes after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC, after successful resuscitation) were recorded.Results A total of 19 patients with CA were treated with CPR-LW1000 type ALC-CPR apparatus for resuscitation, and with 12 males, 7 females; the age ranged from 43 to 87 years, and the average age was (70.32±13.49) years; there were 4 cases of heart disease, and 15 cases of non-heart disease. Compared with before resuscitation, the heart rate [HR (bpm): 115.05±21.70 vs. 0], mean arterial pressure [MAP (mmHg, 1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa): 66.05±11.69 vs. 0], pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2: 0.928±0.057 vs. 0.417±0.118), pH value (7.05±0.23 vs. 6.80±0.28), arterial oxygen partial pressure [PaO2 (mmHg): 65.42±19.11 vs. 42.42±10.78], HCO3- (mmol/L: 19.22±2.77 vs. 17.18±3.76) were significantly improved after successful resuscitation (allP < 0.05), and arterial blood carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2) was decreased after successful resuscitation (mmHg: 53.72±13.23 vs. 57.66±14.86,P > 0.05).Conclusion Rhythmic ALC-CPR has obvious clinical value for CA patients with conventional CPR contraindication.
