Efficacy and safety of stents loaded with 125I seeds for patients with advanced esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2017.07.015
- VernacularTitle:放射性125I粒子支架与普通支架在中晚期食管癌治疗中有效性与安全性的Meta分析
- Author:
Dingkun HOU
;
Bin HUO
;
Xiaodong HUO
;
Hao WANG
;
Lili WANG
;
Li ZANG
;
Jinhuan WANG
;
Shude CHAI
;
Haitao WANG
- Keywords:
Esophagus cancer;
125I seeds;
Efficacy-based;
Safety;
Meta analysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
2017;37(7):550-556
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of stents loaded with 125I seeds compared to conventional stents.Methods Literatures were searched in PubMed,EMbase,Cochrane Library,CBM,CNKI,Wanfang Data and other electronic databases from inception to November 2016.Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria,extracted data and assessed quality of the included studies independently.Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3.Results A total of five RCTs and 14 CCTs involving 1 211 patients were included.The mean survival time of the 125I stent group was significantly higher than that of the control group [mean difference =4.11,95％ CI (2.16-6.07)P ＜0.001].The incidence of restenosis after 3:The available data showed that the incidence of re-staging of 125I stent in the treatment group was lower than that of the normal stent group [RR =0.23,95％ CI(0.12-0.62),P =0.002].Postoperative bleeding [RR =0.80,95％CI (0.52-1.23),P=0.30];Postoperative pain[RR=1.06,95％CI(90.88-1.27),P=0.55];postoperative stent shift [RR =0.53,95％ CI(0.27-1.05),P =0.07].The difference of incidence of complications was not statistically significant.There was no difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups.Conclusions The available data suggest that 125I stent is superior to common stent in the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer.There are no differences found in the incidence of complications between 125I stent and conventional stent.However,due to the limited quality of the included studies,more high-quality and multicenter-based studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
