Comparison of three types of china donation after citizen's death in clinical efficacy and complications after liver transplantation: a report of 422 cases
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1785.2017.07.005
- VernacularTitle:三种类型的器官捐献供肝移植临床疗效及并发症的比较
- Author:
Qifa YE
;
Qianchao HU
;
Yingzi MING
;
Yanfeng WANG
;
Ke CHEN
;
Shaojun YE
;
Guizhu PENG
;
Zibiao ZHONG
;
Yi ZHANG
;
Zhiliang WANG
;
Yujun ZHAO
;
Jing SI
- Keywords:
DCD;
Liver transplantation;
Clinical efficacy;
Complications;
Retrospective analysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Organ Transplantation
2017;38(7):408-413
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare three different types of donor livers (C-Ⅰ,C-Ⅱ,C-Ⅲ) in clinical efficacy,complications and survival rate of liver transplantation.Methods Using the retrospective descriptive study method,the clinical data of 422 patients undergoing liver transplantation,including 124 cases of C-Ⅰ,81 cases of C-Ⅱ and 81 cases of C-Ⅲ in recent 6 years (from June 2010 to June 2016) were analyzed.The same surgical method was performed with piggyback liver transplantation.Observation indicators contained (1) recipient postoperative liver function;(2) the postoperative complications;(3) the recipient survival rate.SPSS 19.0 statistical software was used for analysis.Results (1) The curative effect was evaluated by the changes of ALT and TBIL among three groups of recipients postoperatively.As compared with C-Ⅰ transplantation group and CⅢ transplantation group,the level of ALT in C-Ⅱ transplantation group was significantly increased (P ＜0.05),the clinical efficacy was poorer.(2) The incidence of PNF was 3.23％ in C-Ⅰ group,9.88％ in C-Ⅱ group and 9.88％ in C-Ⅲ group (P＜0.05).The incidence of acute rejection was respectively 9.68％ in C-Ⅰ group,38.27％ in C-Ⅱ group and 38.27％ in C-Ⅲ group (P＜0.001).The incidence of SIRS was respectively 5.65％ in C-Ⅰ group,39.50％ in C-Ⅱ group and 39.50％ in C-Ⅲ group (P＜ 0.001).There were significant differences in the incidence of other complications among the three groups.(3) There were 14 deaths within 3 months,accounting for 17.28％,and the survival rate was 82.72％ in C-Ⅱ group,the 1-,3-,and 5-year survival rate was 76.55％,74.18％ and 76.55％ respectively in C-Ⅰ group,and that was 88.02％,85.72％ and 81.11％ respectively in C-Ⅲ group.Conclusion Since June 2015,C-Ⅰ donors grow up more quickly on year-on-year basis than C-Ⅱ.Simultaneously,the sort-term and long-term clinical efficacy is better in C-Ⅰ transplantation group than in C-Ⅱ transplantation group.How to repair the three types of Chinese standard donor organs and optimize the quality is still a hot point to ensure the healthy development of organ transplantation in China,which needs further investigation.
