A comparative study of ureteroscopic lithotripsy combined with occlusion device and the supine and lithoto-my position mini-invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of upper incarcerated ureteral stones
10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2017.13.018
- VernacularTitle:输尿管镜联合封堵器与斜卧截石联合体位微创经皮肾镜治疗输尿管上段嵌顿性结石比较
- Author:
Yifeng LIN
;
Qiang HE
;
Diandong HUANG
;
Zhilin CHEN
;
Pei WANG
;
Dehui LAI
;
Shiwu YAO
- Keywords:
ureteroscopic lithotripsy;
occlusion device;
mini-invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy;
the supine and lithotomy position
- From:
The Journal of Practical Medicine
2017;33(13):2140-2143
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the efficacy of ureteroscopic lithotripsy(URL)combined with occlusion device and the supine and lithotomy position mini-invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy(mPCNL)in the treatment of upper incarcerated ureteral stones. No difference could be found in age,sex and size of stones between the two groups. Method From Jan. 2014 to Dec. 2016 in our hospital,all cases of upper incarcerated ureteral stones were diviede into two groups:52 in ureteroscopic lithotripsy combined with occlusion device group and 45 in mini-inva-sive percutaneous nephrolithotomy group. Result The hospitalization and operation time in URL group were(5.5 ± 1.4)days and(53.3 ± 12.4)mins,which were significantly shorter than that in mPCNL group with(9.1 ± 3.2)days and(78.2 ± 14.1)mins,(P<0.05). There were no differences between mPCNL and URL groups in the success rate of operation(97.8% vs 94.2%,P > 0.05),stone clearance rate(100% vs 91.8,P > 0.05)and complication rate (4.4%vs 3.9%,P>0.05). Conclusion URL combined with occlusion device can obtain satifactory results as well as the supine and lithotomy position mPCNL in the treatment of upper incarcerated ureteral stones.
