Comparison of efficacy of subcutaneous immunotherapy and sublingual immunotherapy for treating allergic rhinitis

VernacularTitle:皮下免疫与舌下免疫治疗变应性鼻炎的疗效比较
Author: Feng WANG ; Hongting ZHANG ; Juan MENG
Keywords: rhinitis,allergic; immunotherapy; subcutaneous immunotherapy; sublingual immunotherapy
From: Chongqing Medicine 2017;46(21):2906-2908
CountryChina
Language:Chinese
Abstract: Objective To compare the curative efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) versus sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for allergic rhinitis.Methods A total of 127 cases of patients with allergic rhinitis in the outpatient department of our hospital from June 2009 to March 2016 were retrospectively analyzed,including 79 cases treated with SCIT and 48 cases treated with SLIT.The curative effects and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results After 3-year treatment,the total effective rate in the SCIT group was 75.9%,which was higher than 72.9% in the SLIT group,but the difference was not statistically significant (χ2=0.15,P>0.05).The incidence rate of adverse reactions in the SCIT group was 26.6%,which was higher than 10.4% in the SLIT group,the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (χ2=4.79,P<0.05).Conclusion The two desensitization treatment methods all gain better effect,but SLIT has lower occurrence rate of adverse reactions.