Clinical Efficacy of Cold Knife Conization and Transcervical Resection of Cervical Lesionin the Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Ⅱ, Ⅲ
- VernacularTitle:宫颈冷刀锥切术和宫腔镜下宫颈锥切术治疗高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变的疗效分析
- Author:
Yu LIU
;
Ying WANG
;
Yifeng WANG
- Keywords:
Cold knife conization;
Transcervical resection of cervical lesion;
Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
- From:
Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology
2017;33(6):434-437
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of cold knife conization and transcervical resection of cervical lesion in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia(CIN) Ⅱ,Ⅲ.Methods:The clinical data of 62 patients with CIN Ⅱ,Ⅲ underwent cold knife conization(CKC group) and 114 underwent transcervical resection of cervical lesion(TCRC group)in Zhujiang Hospital Southern Medical University from Jan 1 st 2010 to Jun 1 st 2014 were collected.The patients' age,pregnant frequency,mean operative time,preoperative pathological grading,blood loss during the operation and after the operation,positive resected margin,cervical stenosis and recurrence were compared between the two groups.Results:There was no difference on the patients age,pregnant frequency and preoperative pathological grading between the two groups(P ＞ 0.05).The mean blood loss during the operation (14.16 ± 14.10 ml)and the mean hospital stays(5.73 ± 1.43 days)of CKC group were significantly different from those of TCRC group(29.80 ±20.55 ml,4.75 ±1.23 days) (P＜0.05).There was no statistical difference on the mean operation time,postoperative vaginal bleeding rate,rate of positive resected margin,cervical stenosis rate and recurrence rate between CKC group and TCRC group (33.15 ± 11.42 min vs 33.18 ±14.61 min,33.9％ vs 21.1％,3.2％ vs 5.3％,4.8％ vs 4.4％,4.8％ vs 3.5％,respectively) (P＞0.05).The concordance rate of pre-operation and post operation pathological results of CKC group and TCRC group was 74.2％ (46/62) and 72.8％ (83/114) respectively,both kappa values were ＜ 0.75.Conclusions;Both CKC and TCRCT are safe as well as effective in the treatment of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.Compared with CKC,TCRC has the advantage of short hospital stay,while much intraoperative blood loss,which calls for intraoperative attention.
