Orthopantomography and cone-beam CT for bone height measurement and simulation in posterior implant region
10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2017.20.007
- VernacularTitle:锥形束CT与曲面断层片在后牙区可用骨高度测量与种植模拟中的临床评价
- Author:
Xi LU
;
Yi SU
- From:
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
2017;21(20):3152-3157
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Cone-beam CT (CBCT) and orthopantography are two imaging methods mostly used in the preoperative evaluation of dental implantation. CBCT has high cost and low penetration rate, but orthopantography can result in a larger error in the measurement of bone quantity.OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of bone quantity measurement using CBCT and orthopantography, and to evaluate the clinical effect of simulation in posterior implant region. METHODS: 115 implants from 72 patients undergoing implantation of posterior teeth in the Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University were selected. The horizontal heights from the top of the alveolar bone to the important anatomic structures (mandibular nerve or maxillary sinus floor) were measured using CBCT and orthopantography and then analyzed statistically. The implantation simulations were performed using Planmeca Romexis3.8 (for CBCT) and Cliniview9.3 (for orthopantography) to compare the differences in stimulated and postoperative horizontal heights.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: There were significant differences in the measured data between CBCT and orthopantography (P < 0.05), especially in the maxilla (P < 0.01). There were significant differences between the simulated and postoperative results of the two methods (P < 0.05). The average error and standard deviation in orthopantography were larger than those in CBCT. The average error of implantation simulation using CBCT in the maxilla was smaller than that using orthopantography, whereas the error was similar in mandibular simulations. To conclude, CBCT is more accurate for assessing the quantity of bone in posterior implant region, especially in the maxilla. The accuracy of CBCT and orthopantography in implantation simulation needs to be improved.
