Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor cortex in children with motor retardation
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4904.2017.05.016
- VernacularTitle:重复经颅磁刺激对运动发育迟缓患儿皮质运动区的影响
- Author:
Min WANG
;
Xinjian LI
;
Xin JIN
;
Zhongxiu YANG
;
Zhilin LI
- Keywords:
Developmental disabilities;
Transcranial magnetic stimulation;
Rehabilitation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2017;40(5):446-449
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To observe the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with rehabilitation training on motor cortex in children with motor retardation. Methods Sixty children with motor retardation were divided into treatment group and control group by random digits table method with 30 cases each. The children in control group were treated with rehabilitation training, and the children in treatment group were treated with rTMS combined with rehabilitation training. Two groups were treated for 3 courses. The Gesell pediatric neuropsychological scale and gross motor function measure (GMFM) scale before and after treatment were evaluated. Results There was no headache, dizziness and abnormal pathological reaction in the 2 groups. The motor behavior development quotient scores of Gesell pediatric neuropsychological scale after treatment in control group and treatment group were significantly higher than those before treatment: (64.37 ± 16.37) scores vs. (62.37 ± 14.21) scores and (74.50 ± 13.32) scores vs. (61.90 ± 13.76) scores, but the score in treatment was significantly higher than that in control group, and there were statistical differences (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in language behavior development quotient score between after treatment and before treatment in control group: (79.57 ± 5.93) scores vs. (79.07 ± 5.75) scores, P>0.05. The language behavior development quotient after treatment in treatment group was significantly higher than that before treatment:(80.70 ± 5.38) scores vs. (78.57 ± 5.72) scores, and there was statistical difference (P<0.05). The A, B, C and D area scores of GMFM scale after treatment in control group and treatment group were significantly higher than before treatment, which in control group were (76.43 ± 19.18)% vs. (75.40 ± 19.38)%, (50.53 ± 27.63)%vs. (49.60 ± 28.22)%, (31.07 ± 24.93)%vs. (28.40 ± 23.70)%and (1.60 ± 1.33)%vs. (0.89 ± 0.37)%, and in treatment group were (85.80 ± 13.73)%vs. (79.13 ± 16.87)%, (65.77 ± 26.27)%vs. (49.37 ± 29.67)%, (49.60 ± 28.22)%vs. (28.83 ± 23.19)%and (2.10 ± 1.60)%vs. (1.07 ± 0.43)%, and there were statistical differences (P<0.05); the A, B and C area scores after treatment in treatment group were significantly higher than those in control group, and there were statistical differences (P<0.05); but there was no statistical difference in D area score after treatment between 2 groups (P>0.05). Conclusions The rTMS combined with rehabilitation training is better in gross movement than the single rehabilitation training for children with motor retardation. The rTMS can improve the motor function and language ability of children.
