Clinical Features and Outcomes of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in 16 Patients With Dilated-phase Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2017.05.010
- VernacularTitle:扩张期肥厚型心肌病16例患者心脏再同步化治疗的临床特征及疗效分析
- Author:
Min GU
;
Han JIN
;
Wei HUA
;
Hongxia NIU
;
Jing WANG
;
Ligang DING
;
Cong XUE
;
Shu ZHANG
- Keywords:
Heart failure;
Cardiomyopathy;
Cardiac resynchronization therapy
- From:
Chinese Circulation Journal
2017;32(5):461-464
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To analyze the clinical features and outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with dilated-phase hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (DHCM). Methods: A total of 16 DHCM patients received CRT in our hospital from 2007-03 to 2016-01 were retrospectively studied to analyze their clinical features and outcomes. Results: There were 12 male and 4 female patients at the mean age of (53.3±13.5) years. Pre-operative QRS duration of ECG was (158.7±32.2) ms, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was (33.6±6.3) %, the patient with NYHA class I, II, III and IV were 1, 5, 8 and 2 respectively. 13 patients received new CRT device, 3 received upgraded device and 8 (50%) combining atrial fibrillation (AF). The patients were followed-up for (2.56±2.13) years, 5 of them died including 3 of heart failure, 1 of sudden death and 1 of stroke. At 6 months follow-up time, 7 patients had the response to CRT which was defined by the improvement of NYHA class≥1 and the absolute elevation of LVEF≥5%; NYHA class improved from (2.69±0.79) to (2.38±0.89), P=0.02; LVEF increased from (33.6±6.3) % to (40.03±9.83) %, P=0.01. Conclusion: DHCM patients with CRT indication had the higher incidence to suffer from AF, those were more in patients with traditional pacemaker or ICD upgrading. DHCM patients with CRT had the poor general prognosis, while there was still certain proportion of patients had the response to CRT.