Comparison of PG-SGA, NRS 2002 and BIA in nutritional assessment and screening of patients with gynecologic cancers
10.16151/j.1007-810x.2017.04.008
- VernacularTitle:妇科恶性肿瘤病人不同营养评估方法的对比分析
- Author:
Yongning CHEN
;
Yang GUAN
;
Li ZHENG
;
Wenlian LIU
;
Chunhua WU
;
Yadi ZHANG
;
Li CHEN
;
Shipeng GONG
- Keywords:
Uterine cervical neoplasms;
Endometrial neoplasms;
Ovarian neoplasms;
PG-SGA;
NRS 2002;
BIA;
Malnutrition;
Nutritional risk
- From:
Parenteral & Enteral Nutrition
2017;24(4):221-224
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the application of PG-SGA,NRS 2002 and BIA in nutritional assessment and screening of patients with gynecologic cancers.Methods:118 patients were randomly selected.Nutritional status were evaluated by PG-SGA,NRS 2002 and BIA,and consistency between each tools were compared.Results:The prevalence of malnutrition or nutritional risk of patients were 64.4％ (PG-SGA),57.6％ (NRS 2002),and 33.9％ (BIA) respectively.In all patients,the consistency of PG-SGA and NRS 2002 was high (P ＜ 0.001),while there were not significantly consistent between BIA and PG-SGA,or between BIA and NRS 2002 (P ＜ 0.001).Conclusion:According to the evaluation of PG-SGA or NRS 2002 in gynecologic patients,the prevalence of malnutrition or nutritional risk is high,and these two scales are suitable for nutritional assessment and screening of gynecologic cancer patients,especially in ovarian cancer patients.In addition,BIA may be a promising tool to evaluate cervical cancer patients' nutritional status.
