The Efficacy and Safety of Low Molecular Weight Heparin and Unfarction Heparin were Compared in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2017.27.012
- VernacularTitle:低分子肝素与普通肝素对经皮冠脉介入手术的疗效和安全性的比较
- Author:
Jinglu LIU
;
Xiang SONG
;
Yang LI
;
Xin WANG
;
Xueqi LI
- Keywords:
Low molecular weight heparin;
Unfractionated heparin;
Coronary intervention;
Efficacy;
Safety
- From:
Progress in Modern Biomedicine
2017;17(27):5251-5254,5261
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparin and unfarction heparin in patients with coronary heart disease during percutaneous coronary intervention by investigating the MACE beteewn the percutaneous coronary intervention procedure and post percutaneous coronary intervention 72 hours.Methods:200 patients with coronary heart disease who accepted percutaneous coronary intervention were investigated in this study.According to the anticoagulants,these patients were divided into LMWH subgroup(117 cases) and UFH subgroup(83 cases).According to conventional method,the MACE what happened during percutaneous coronary intervention procedure and post percutaneous coronary intervention 72 hours come from each group of patients was investigated and these statistics were analysised so that evaluate the efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparin and unfarction heparin.Results:(1) There were no statistical significance in baseline characteristics between the each group (P＞0.05).(2) There were statistical significance in the incidence of TIMI flow slows between the each group (P＜0.05),low molecular weight heparin is superior to unfarction heparin in terms of efficacy.(3)There were no statistical significance in death between the each group (P＞0.05),but there were statistical significance in bleeding / hematoma complications,and other (pericardial tamponade,chest pain,cardiogenic shock,cardiac rapture,ventricular septal perforation,ventricular tachycardia,ventricular fibrillation,cardiac arrest,Aspen attack,stent thrombosis and so on) between the each group (P＜0.05),low molecular weight heparin less adverse reactions,higher safety.Conclusion:Low molecular weight heparin in the percutaneous coronary intervention effect is more significant,and less than UFH adverse reactions and high safety,more suitable for percutaneous coronary intervention anticoagulant therapy.
