Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS)in assessment of patients with depression
10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2017.08.008
- VernacularTitle:斯奈思-汉密尔顿快感量表中文版测评抑郁症患者的效度和信度
- Author:
Xuqiang HU
;
Mincai QIAN
;
Min LIN
;
Shiliang WANG
;
Chenhong YANG
;
Wei CHEN
- Keywords:
depression;
Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale;
validity;
reliability
- From:
Chinese Mental Health Journal
2017;31(8):625-629
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To test the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS).Methods:Totally 166 patients with major depression completed the Chinese version of SHAPS,Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-Ⅰ) and Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17).The validity was tested by using correlation analysis and exploratory factor analysis.The reliability was tested by using internal consistency coefficient and Pearson correlation analysis.Results:The ICCs between three different Scale score were 0.90 and 0.91(Ps ＜ 0.001).Exploratory factor analysis identified 2 common factors,which explained 62.8％ of total variancel.The Cronbach coefficient of SHAPS was 0.94.The test-retest coefficient was 0.91 (P ＜ 0.001).The intercorrelations of 14 items ranged from 0.30 to 0.93 and item-total correlations ranged from 0.61 to 0.79.Conclusion:The Chinese version of SHAPS has good validity and reliability,it could be used to assess anhedonia in Chinese patients with major depression.
