Expression intensity and clinical significance of intrahepatic hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis B core antigen in 994 patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2397.2017.04.002
- VernacularTitle:慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染者994例肝组织HBsAg和HBcAg表达强度的临床意义
- Author:
Sheng YING
;
Airong HU
;
Suwen JIANG
;
Shanshan JIN
;
Huadong YAN
;
Yaoren HU
- Keywords:
Hepatitis B,chronic;
Hepatitis B surface antigen;
Hepatitis B core antigen
- From:
Chinese Journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases
2017;10(4):250-256
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the intensity of HBsAg and HBcAg expression in liver tissue of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and its clinical significance.Methods A total of 994 HBV infected patients underwent liver biopsy and histopathological examination.The expression of HBsAg and HBcAg in liver tissue was detected by histoimmunochemistry.Patients were divided into HBeAg (+)/HBVDNA(+), HBeAg(-)/HBV DNA(+) and HBeAg(-)/HBV DNA(-) groups according to HBeAg and HBV DNA levels;patients were divided into ＜2 × normal (ULN) group, 2-＜5 × ULN groupand ≥5 × ULN group according to the alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels.The histologic activity (A), fibrosis (F), the expression of HBsAg and HBcAg in liver tissue and their correlations with clinical features were analyzed.Logistic regression analysis was used to study the factors affecting the expression of HBsAg and HBcAg in liver tissue.Results Among 994 HBV infected patients, 941 cases (94.67％) were intrahepatic HBsAg positive and 553 cases (55.63％) were intrahepatic HBcAg positive;403 cases (40.85％) were ≥A2 in histologic activity and 371 cases (36.09％) were ≥F2 in fibrosis.The degree of A and F was the highest in HBeAg (-) / HBV DNA (+) group, followed by HBeAg (-) / HBV DNA (-) group, and was the lowest in HBeAg (+) / HBV DNA (+) group.The intensity of intrahepatic HBsAg expression was significantly different among three groups (x2 =6.299, r =-0.760, P ＜ 0.05), however, the difference was not showed in pairwise comparisons.The difference of intrahepatic HBcAg intensity among three groups was statistically significant (x2 =282.995, r =-0.645, P ＜ 0.01), the intensity was the highest in HBeAg (+) / HBV DNA (+) group and the lowest in HBeAg (-) / HBV DNA (-) group.The constituent ratio of HBeAg positive and HBV DNA level were higher and the average age was lower in intrahepatic HBsAg positive group than those in HBsAg negative group.The constituent ratio of positive HBeAg, the levels of ALT, AST, PLT and HBV DNA were higher and the average age, the average FIB-4 level were lower in intrahepatic HBcAg positive group than those in HBcAg negative group.The HBV DNA level was an independent risk factor for intrahepatic HBsAg intensity, and the HBeAg positive and HBV DNA level were independent risk factors for intrahepatic HBcAg intensity.There were no significant differences in A and F among different groups of intrahepatic HBsAg intensity (x2 =1.943 and 2.630, both P ＞ 0.05).There was significant difference in F among different groups of intrahepatic HBcAg intensity (x2 =12.352, P ＜ 0.01), but not in A.The degree of F was the highest in intrahepatic HBcAg negative group.There was significant difference in intrahepatic HBcAg intensity among different groups of ALT level (x2 =16.349, P ＜ 0.01), but not in intrahepatic HBsAg intensity.The intrahepatic HBcAg intensity in ALT ＜ 2 × ULN group was lower than that in other two groups.Conclusions Most of patients with chronic HBV infection are intrahepatic HBsAg positive and more than half of them are intrahepatic HBcAg positive.The intrahepatic HBsAg intensity is not associated with A and F, but correlates with HBV DNA level.The intrahepatic HBcAg intensity is not associated with A, but it is negatively correlated with F and positively correlated with positive HBeAg expression, HBV DNA level and ALT level.
