Observation of the effect of two rehabilitation treatments to staff in office with cervical spondylosis
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2017.12.032
- VernacularTitle:两种康复治疗方案对办公室人员颈椎病的疗效观察
- Author:
Na WANG
;
Mingyue JI
;
Kai ZHANG
- Keywords:
Rehabilitation;
Spinal diseases;
Cervical vertebra;
Office management
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2017;24(12):1874-1877
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To observe the effects of two rehabilitation programs to staff in office with cervical spondylosis,and to explore the appropriate rehabilitation program for this group of people.Methods There were 37 office personnel with cervical spondylosis were selected by the inclusion criteria.They were randomly divided into treatment group A(once a week,n=17) and treatment group B (once a week,n=20) according to the random number table method.The treatment group A took middle frequency electrotherapy and infrared therapy,while the treatment group B took tuina manipulation.The changes of visual analogue scale (VAS) and cervical range of movement (ROM) were observed after 10 weeks of treatment.Results Compared with before treatment,the VAS scores of the two treatment groups decreased with statistically significant difference after 10 weeks of treatment(tA=12.91,tB=13.88,all P<0.05).There was no significant difference in VAS score between the two treatment groups after treatment(t=0.22,P>0.05).Compared with before treatment,the cervical ROM of the two groups increased significantly after treatment(tA anteflexion=-4.59,tA posterior extension=-5.13,tA left flexion=-4.24,tA right flexion=-3.25,tA left circumflexion=-7.13,tA right circumflexion=-7.47,tB anteflexion=-5.85,tB posterior extension=-7.28,tB left flexion=-8.64,tB right flexion=-8.38,tB left circumflexion=-11.72,tB right circumflexion=-11.95,all P<0.05).There were significant differences in the increase range of flexion,left flexion and left circumflexion between the two treatment groups after treatment(tflexion=-2.29,tleft flexion=-2.77,tleft circumflexion=-2.32,all P<0.05),but posterior extension,right flexion and right circumflexion had no statistically significant diffferences(tposterior extension=-1.97,tright flexion=-1.97,tright circumflexion=-1.97,all P>0.05).Conclusion The two kinds of rehabilitation programs can relieve the neck pain of the office personnel,but treatment group B is better than treatment group A in increasing cervical ROM.
