Meta-analysis of antibiotics therapy for Brucellosis
10.3969/j.issn.1000-484X.2017.05.019
- VernacularTitle:布病抗生素治疗的Meta分析
- Author:
Feng DING
;
Yumei ZHOU
;
Yuanqiang ZHENG
;
Yanchun SHI
- Keywords:
Brucellosis;
Antibiotic;
Relapse;
Adverse reaction
- From:
Chinese Journal of Immunology
2017;33(5):726-733
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of most common used regimens against brucellosis.Methods: Search PubMed and CENTRAL database of Cochrane library for all literatures written in English about treatment of brucellosis and CBM database for all RCTs for Brucellosis in Chinese from the year 1985 till now.Assess the quality of the included literatures using Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias form.Combine data of relapse,total therapeutic failure,and adverse reaction of regimens for treating human brucellosis.Results: 17 literatures were included.Combined antibiotic therapeutic regimens such as DR,DS,QR and DG were compared.Rate of total therapeutic failure(RRcb:2.53,95%CI:1.51-4.23) and relapse(RRcb:2.69,95%CI:1.46-4.98) of DS regimen was lower than those of DR regimen,while adverse reaction did not show any significant differences between them(RRcb:1.40,95%CI:0.97-2.01).No significant differences were seen in rate of relapse(RRcb:1.24,95%CI:0.67-2.30) and total therapeutic failure(RRcb:1.41,95%CI:0.86-2.32) between QR and DR regimen.QR regimen had lower rate of adverse reaction than DR regimen(RRcb:1.79,95%CI:1.17-2.74).Conclusion: DS regimen priors to DR regimen.QR equals DR in treatment outcome,has fewer adverse reactions meanwhile.Triple antimicrobial based on double regimens seemed to provide better outcomes without a significant increase in adverse reaction,but more clinical evidences are still needed.
