Comparison of the two different systems for contrast injection in coronary angiography
10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2017.04.005
- VernacularTitle:冠状动脉造影术对比剂两种注射方法的比较
- Author:
Hongyan ZHAO
;
Bo LUAN
;
Aijie HOU
;
Zhanquan. LI
- Keywords:
Coronary angiography;
Contrast injection system;
Automated contrast injection system;
Manual contrast injection system
- From:
Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology
2017;25(4):202-205
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To study whether the contrast volume and radiation dose can be reduced by automated contrast injection system(ACIS) in coronary angiography compared with manual contrast injection system(MCIS).Methods 200 patients undergoing coronary angiography with transradial approach in the People′s Hospital of Liaoning Province were enrolled in the study from January 2016 to June 2016.They were divided into the ACIS group (n=100) and the MCIS group (n=100).The clinical data, the net amount of contrast the total amount of contrast media consumed, number of angiographic views performed, fluoroscopy time, air kerma (AK) and dose area product (DAP) of the two groups were statistically analyzed.Results There were no statistical differences in the clinical data, the net amount of contrast used, number of angiographic views performed and fluoroscopy time between the two groups (all P>0.05).The total amount of contrast media used, AK, and DAP were less in the ACIS group than in the MCIS group (all P<0.05).Conclusions The volume of contrast consumption and radiation dose can be reduced by ACIS during coronary angiography with transradial approach compared to MCIS.
