Analysis and Comparison of Reference Intervals of Serum Total Bilirubin and Serum Direct Bilirubin with Upcoming Industry Standards in China
10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2017.03.043
- VernacularTitle:我国血清总胆红素和直接胆红素检验项目参考区间现状与即将发布行业标准的分析比较
- Author:
Shishi ZHANG
;
Wei WANG
;
Haijian ZHAO
;
Falin HE
;
Kun ZHONG
;
Zhiguo WANG
- Keywords:
serum total bilirubin;
serum direct bilirubin;
reference intervals;
quality control
- From:
Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine
2017;32(3):152-156
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the reference intervals of serum total bilirubin (TBIL) and serum direct bilirubin (DBIL) by all Chinese clinical laboratories and make a comparison with the upcoming part 4 of Industry Standard WS/T 404.Methods Relevant information about reference intervals of all clinical laboratories participating in TBIL and DBIL testing items of 2014 national external quality assessment scheme of clinical routine chemistry was collected by a web-based external quality assessment software,including source,grouping,verification,upper and lower limits of reference intervals and instruments,reagents,methods and calibrators used.Microsoft Excel 2010 and SPSS 19.0 were applied to statistical analysis.The comparison between reference intervals used and the upcoming Industry Standard was conducted by the simple mean t test.Laboratories derived from the highest percentage of source distribution whose reagent and instrument were matching with each other were grouped according to the test systems used and the differences of reference intervals between three mainly used test systems and the upcoming Industry Standard were also compared with the single sample mean t test.Results The number of laboratories participated in the investigation about source distribution of reference intervals for TBIL and DBIL was 749 and 709 respectively.For these two items,the highest sources were both instructions of reagent(TBIL 58.08％,DBIL 58.67 ％),next were both National Clinical Laboratory Operation Rules (3rd Edition) (TBIL 29.64 ％,DBIL 28.91 ％),the percentages of other sources were all less than 10％.Besides,there were respectively 379 (50.60％) and 354 (49.93％) laboratories verifying their reference intervals for TBIL and DBIL.The difference of the comparison between reference intervals used and the upcoming Industry Standard had statistical significance (P＜0.05).The using reference intervals were narrower than the upcoming Industry Standard for both items.In all laboratories with reference intervals from instructions of reagent,themating laboratories respectively accounted for 41.88％ and 41.48％％ for item TBIL and DBIL.As the single sample mean t test showed,the comparison of the reference intervals between three mainly used test systems in these mating laboratories and the upcoming Industry Standard had statistical significance (P＜0.05),except for the lower limit of DBIL with Beckman test system (P value was 0.068) and the upper limit of DBIL with HITACHI test system (P value was 0.087).Conclusion Currently,the using situation of reference intervals about TBIL and DBIL by all Chinese laboratories was not scientific and rational enough and has significant difference with the upcoming Industry Standard.Should publish the part 4 of Industry Standard WS/T 404 as soon as possible,which would help clinical laboratories establishing suitable reference intervals and promote the standardization of its usage.
