Reasons for misdiagnosis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in identifying thyroid nodules
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6090.2017.04.011
- VernacularTitle:甲状腺良恶性结节实时超声造影误诊分析
- Author:
Lili HUANG
;
Dehua KONG
;
Qi ZHOU
;
Xiaoying LEI
;
Jue JIANG
;
Hongli ZHANG
- Keywords:
Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound;
Thyroid nodules;
Thyroid carcinoma;
Calcification
- From:
Chinese Journal of Endocrine Surgery
2017;11(4):307-310
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the reason for misdiagnosis of real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in identifying benign and malignant thyroid nodules and the impact of nodule size and calcification on CEUS result.Methods Retrospective analysis were carried out in 331 cases of thyroid disease patients with 421 nodules.All the nodules were performed CEUS and confirmed by pathology.Results In the total of 421 nodules,33 nodular goiters were misdiagnosed as thyroid carcinoma.8 nodular goiters were misdiagnosed as thyroid adenoma.8 thyroid carcinomas were misdiagnosed as nodular goiter,2 thyroid carcinomas were misdiagnosed as thyroid adenoma.The accuracy of diagnosis for thyroid benign and malignant lesions by CEUS was 87.89％,and the misdiagnosis rate was 12.11％.The size of the thyroid nodule and the form of calcification had influence on diagnosis.In the group with diameter of the nodule less than 10 mm,the misdiagnosis rate was higher compared with the other two groups,and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).In addition,the misdiagnosis rate in the group with bulky calcification was higher than microcalcifications group,and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).Conclusion The size of the thyroid nodule and the form of calcification have some impact on diagnosis of CEUS.To make clear the reason for misdiagnosis is beneficial to improve the diagnostic level of thyroid diseases.
