The diagnostic value of virtual bronchoscopic navigation, endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath and rapid on-site evaluation for solitary pulmonary nodules
10.11958/20170631
- VernacularTitle:虚拟内镜、GS外周超声探头联合快速现场评价对孤立性肺结节的诊断价值
- Author:
Yaping ZHAO
;
Juan WANG
;
Wei XIE
;
Peng ZHANG
;
Jing FENG
;
Lixia DONG
;
Jie CAO
- Keywords:
ultrasonography;
sarcoidosis;
pulmonary;
lung neoplasms;
virtual bronchoscopic navigation;
endobronchial ultrasonography with guide sheath;
rapid on-site evaluation;
solitary pulmonary nodules;
peripheral pulmonary lesion
- From:
Tianjin Medical Journal
2017;45(9):925-930
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) under virtual bronchoscopic navigation (direct path), endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath (GS) and rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) for solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs). Methods One hundred and seventy-eight patients who were underwent transbronchial lung biopsy in the Tianjin Medical University General Hospital between January 2015 to December 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. CT images of all patients showed solitary pulmonary nodules surrounded by lung tissue, and ROSE was undergone during the procedure. The patients were divided into conventional (C-TBLB) group, virtual bronchoscopic navigation (VBN) group, endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath (GS) group, and virtual bronchoscopic navigation combined with endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath group (combination) depending on the different devices. The diagnostic yield and the location or the effect of lesion on the diagnostic rate were compared between four groups. The coincidence rate of ROSE and the histopathological findings of TBLB were compared. The value of ROSE for the early diagnosis of disease was further evaluated. Results The diagnostic rates were 32.5％(13/40), 66.7％(24/36), 68.2％(30/44) and 75.8％(44/58) for C-TBLB group, VBN group, GS group and combination group, respectively. There were significant differences in diagnostic rates between C-TBLB group and other tree groups (χ2=8.853, 10.677 and 18.293, P<0.008). But there were no significant differences in diagnostic rates between VBN group, GS group and combination group (P>0.008). The diagnostic rates for peripheral pulmonary nodules were 12.5％ (2/16), 42.9％ (6/14), 40.0％ (4/10) and 75.9％(22/29) in C-TBLB group, VBN group, GS group and combination group. The diagnostic rate was significantly higher in combination group than that of other three groups (χ2=17.434, P<0.05). The result of ROSE was consistent with result of histopathology (Kappa = 0.775, P<0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of ROSE during transbronchial biopsy for solitary pulmonary nodules were 90.7％, 87.0％, 86.7％, 90.9％ and 88.8％, respectively. No pneumothorax, hemoptysis or other serious complications were found in patients. Conclusion Virtual bronchoscopic navigation, endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath for solitary pulmonary nodules by transbronchial lung biopsy can improve the diagnostic rate of solitary pulmonary nodules.
