Clinical effectiveness of annulus repair after discectomy under Mast Quadrant system for lumbar disc herniation
10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2017.24.024
- VernacularTitle:可扩张脊柱微创通道下腰椎间盘突出症髓核摘除后纤维环裂口的缝合修复
- Author:
Xin JIANG
;
Feng LI
;
Haisong PAN
;
Xiongtao HUO
;
Qiangbing XIAO
;
Gongxu YANG
- From:
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
2017;21(24):3912-3917
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND:Anular repair after discectomy in intervertebral disc degeneration obtains good clinical outcomes and reduces the recurrent rate, but there is little report on the effective suturing method and reliable instrument. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical effectiveness of annulus repair after discectomy under Mast Quadrant system for lumbar disc herniation. METHODS: Fifty patients with lumbar disc herniation admitted in the Hubei Provincial Hospital of TCM from August 2013 to August 2015 were selected, followed by divided into experimental and control groups (n=25 per group), and then received annulus repair after discectomy and simple discectomy, respectively. The length of incision, operation time and intraoperative blood loss were compared between two groups, and the Oswestry disability index and visual analogue scale scores for lumbago and lower limb pain before and after surgery were detected, as well as the incidence of complications and recurrence were recorded. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:All patients in the experimental group completed the follow-up, while only 23 in the control group finished the follow-up. There were no significant differences in the baseline data between two groups (P > 0.05). The postoperative Oswestry disability index and visual analogue scale scores in both two groups were significantly lower than those before surgery (P < 0.05). There was a significant difference in the visual analog scale score at 1 month postoperatively between two groups (P < 0.05), while the scores at other time points showed insignificant difference between two groups (P > 0.05). There were two cases of recurrence in the control group, one of which received secondary treatment, and the recurrent rate was 9%. In the experimental group, there was only one case of recurrence receiving no treatment, and the recurrent rate was 4%. There were no cerebrospinal fluid leakage, infection, never root injury or other serious complications in both two groups. These results indicate that annulus repair after discectomy is minimally invasive, achieves the reconstruction of disc, and reduces the recurrence rate, which is available for lumbar disc herniation.
