Safety and efficacy of straight light beam greenlight PVRP and PVP in treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
10.3969/j.issn.1007-1989.2017.05.008
- VernacularTitle:直出绿激光汽化切除术与选择性绿激光汽化术治疗良性前列腺增生的疗效分析
- Author:
Shuaiqi CHEN
;
Feng ZHU
;
Chunlei WU
;
Xinjun ZHANG
;
Pei LIU
;
Qinnan YU
;
Huiqing ZHANG
- Keywords:
benign prostatic hyperplasia;
photoselective vaporesection of the prostate;
photoselective vaporization of the prostate
- From:
China Journal of Endoscopy
2017;23(5):34-38
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To discuss the safety and efficacy of straight light beam greenlight photoselective vaporesection of the prostate (PVRP) and photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) in treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods 113 cases of BPH were randomly divided into two groups, 62 cases in PVRP group and 51cases in PVP group. Clinical data was collected and compared between the two groups, including pre-operation and six month after operation international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QOL), urine flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual urine (PVR), as well as operational time, operative bleeding volume, bladder irrigation time, indwelling catheter time after operation and complications after operation. Results All the patients were operated successfully without serious complications. There was significant difference in operative time [(49.4 ± 18.9) min vs (75.1 ± 20.7) min (P < 0.05)] between the two groups. There were no significant difference in blood loss and bladder washing time after operation. The Qmax after 6 months of surgery, PVR, IPSS, QOL of the two groups had significantly improved compared with preoperative (P < 0.05), while the difference between the two groups had no significance in statistics (P > 0.05). Conclusions Treatment of straight light beam greenlight PVRP and PVP are safe and effective for BPH. Straight light beam greenlight PVRP has the advantages of shorter operation time.
