Comparison of three kinds of nutritional screening tools in clinical application of general surgery patients application
10.3969/j.issn.1009-9905.2017.06.009
- VernacularTitle:NRS2002、SGA及MNA在普外科患者中的应用研究
- Author:
Xiaoming GAO
;
Chunyan HAO
;
Peihua ZHU
;
Junjing WANG
;
Peng YAN
;
Rong CHEN
- Keywords:
Nutritional evaluation;
General surgery;
Malnutrition
- From:
Chinese Journal of Current Advances in General Surgery
2017;20(6):454-457
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the applicability and consistency of NRS2002,SGA and MNA in general surgery hospitalized patients and analyze the effect in clinical outcomes of NRS resuits with respect to each tool.Method:The 150 patients hospitalized in our hospital were chosen as object of study,to screen and evaluate nutritional risk of patients by NRS 2002,SGA and MNA,respectively,on the second hospital day,then to compare the consistency of NRS results with respect to the four tools on clinical outcomes.Results:The applicabilities of hospital NRS2002,SGA and MNA were alternatively 97.25,97.25％ and 98.35％.The evaluation of patients' NRS corresponding to different four tools was consistent.The effects of screening results of MNA,NRS2002 and SGA on clinical outcomes were most closely related.Conclusion:The three nutritional evaluation tools can be applied to the screening of malnutrition in General Surgery.The effects of screening results of NRS2002 and SGA on clinical outcomes were most closely related.
