Contribution of Color Doppler Scoring System to Diagnosis of Ovarian Malignancy.
- Author:
Duk Soo BAE
;
Jong Dae WHANG
;
Seon Hye PARK
;
Bo Hyun KIM
;
In Sook JOO
;
Chang Soo PARK
;
Je Ho LEE
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Color Doppler;
Scoring system;
Ovarian malignancy
- MeSH:
Cystadenoma, Mucinous;
Cystadenoma, Serous;
Diagnosis*;
Endometriosis;
Female;
Humans;
Prospective Studies;
Sensitivity and Specificity;
Teratoma;
Ultrasonography
- From:Korean Journal of Gynecologic Oncology and Colposcopy
1997;8(3):271-278
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of color Doppler scoring system in characterization of ovarian masses. We performed transabdominal or transvaginal color Doppler sonopaphy on 82 women with ovarian masses and analyzed the sonographic findings. Ovarian lesions were assessed by means of morphological and color Doppler scoring system by Kurjak. Tumors were characterized by ultrasonographic findings as benign or suspected of being malignant. Then the results of each scoring systems were correlated with histopathological findings. The results were as follows; Of 82 ovarian masses, 64 were benign lesions(13 mucinous cystadenomas, 16 endometriomas, 20 teratomas, 8 serous cystadenomas, and 13 other abnormalities), and 18 were malignant(12 cancers and 6 borderline tumors). The color Doppler scoring system was useful in distinguishing malignant from benign masses, with a sensitivity of 88.2%, compared with the morphological scoring system of 86.7%. The specificity of color Doppler and morphological scoring system were 95.4% and 92.5%, respectively. The sensitivity of combination of both scoring systems was 88.9%, with a specificity of 96.9%. In conclusion, color Doppler scoring system is a useful tool in predicting the malignancy of ovarian lesions especially combined with morphological scoring system.
