A preliminary efficacy evaluation for percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy in treating infectious pancreatic necrosis
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-1935.2017.02.002
- VernacularTitle:经皮内镜坏死组织清创术治疗感染性胰腺坏死的疗效评价
- Author:
Huabing HUANG
;
Dong WANG
;
Jing XIE
;
Yanbo ZENG
;
Yuanhang DONG
;
Yan CHEN
;
Zhaoshen LI
;
Yiqi DU
- Keywords:
Pancreatitis;
acute mecrotizing;
Percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy;
Surgical procedures;
minimally invasive
- From:
Chinese Journal of Pancreatology
2017;17(2):77-81
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effect of percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy (PEN) in treating infectious pancreatic necrosis (IPN).Methods A retrospective review of clinical data of 6 patients with IPN who received PEN in Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University from Dec 2015 to Sep 2016 was performed.Clinical parameters were recorded, including basic information, severity evaluation and therapeutic methods and times.In addition, vital sign parameters and inflammatory marks before and after PEN treatment were compared.Results There were 4 patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) and 2 patients with moderately severe acute pancreatitis (MSAP) in these 6 patients with IPN.Mean APACHEⅡ score was 12 (10~15), and mean MCTSI scores was 9.3(8~10).All 6 patients received a total of 13 times PEN treatments, with a mean of 2.2(1~3) times.Each patient was treated with a mean of 2.5(1~4) drainage tubes placed in the peripancreatic abscess after PEN treatment, and the mean time for drainage was 139 d(106~183 d).Besides, the mean hospitalization time was 116 d (48~223 d).All the patients′ condition was improved significantly after PEN treatment, including reduced heart rate, body temperature and inflammatory markers, without bleeding or other serious complications.Only 1 patient had pancreatic fistula after treatment, and no patients needed open abdominal drainage surgery.Patients with higher MCTSI scores likely required more times of PEN and more drainage catheters, longer length of drainage and hospital stay.Conclusions PEN was safe and effective for treating patient with IPN, but those with higher MCTSI scores were associated with more PEN treatments, more drainage tubes, and longer time of drainage and hospitalization.
