Clinical Efficacy Comparison among Dezocine, Fentanyl and Sufentanil in Fibrobronchoscope-guided Con-scious Endotracheal Intubation
10.3969/j.issn.1008-049X.2017.09.021
- VernacularTitle:地佐辛与芬太尼、舒芬太尼在纤维支气管镜引导清醒气管插管中的效果比较
- Author:
Anni XU
;
Xiaoyang WU
- Keywords:
Dezocine;
Fentanyl;
Sufentanil;
Conscious intubation;
Fibrobronchoscope
- From:
China Pharmacist
2017;20(9):1604-1607
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of dezocine, fentanyl and sufentanil at the equivalent dose on hemodynam-ics, sedation and analgesia in fibrobronchoscope-guided. Methods:A total of ninety patients with anticipated difficult airways expected to be nasally intubated using fibrobronchoscope were enrolled and randomly divided into three groups:dezocine group ( group D) , fent-anyl group ( group F) and fentanyl group ( group S) . Ten minutes before the intubation, each group was intravenously given dezocine 0. 15mg ·kg-1 , fentanyl 3μg ·kg-1 and sufentanil 0. 2μg·kg-1 , respectively. The values of HR, MAP and SPO2 were recorded respectively at the time when the patients entered the operation room ( T0 ) , before the bronchoscopy-guided tracheal intubation ( T1 ) , after the intubation ( T2 ) and 5 minutes after the intubation ( T3 ) . The Ramsay sedation score before the intubation and adverse reac-tions during the intubation were also observed. Results: In group F and group S, HR and MAP decreased significantly at T1 ( P<0. 05). The levels of SPO2 decreased significantly at T1 and MAP increased significantly at T2 in the three groups (P<0. 05). The levels of HR, MAP and SpO2 in group F and group S were lower than those in group D (P<0. 05). The levels of HR and MAP in group F at T2 were higher than those in group D and group S, and SPO2 was dropped significantly in group F and group S (P<0. 05). The levels of HR in group S dropped significantly, and were lower than those in the other two groups. MAP in group F was higher than those in the other two groups (P<0. 05). From the Ramsay sedation analysis, the scores of the three groups increased significantly and the score in group S was higher than that in group F (P <0. 05). The incidence of nausea and respiratory depression in group F was significantly higher than that in group D (P<0. 05). The incidence of agitation in group F was significantly higher than that of group S (P<0. 05). The incidence of respiratory depression in group S was significantly higher than that of group D and group F (P<0. 05). Conclusion:Dezocine combined with surface anesthesia has a slight effect on hemodynamics during the tracheal intubation guided by bronchoscopy in the patients with difficult airways. The incidence of reverse reactions of dezocine is lower than that of fenta-nyl and sufentanil.
