Comparison of reliability and reproducibility of three different classifications in pelvic fracture
10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2017.25.028
- VernacularTitle:骨盆骨折3种分型的可信度和可重复性比较
- Author:
Qingbin LI
;
Zhaohua ZHANG
;
Yongqiang LAO
;
Tianhang XUAN
;
Rongsen LUO
;
Minshuang WANG
;
Haiwen PAN
;
Chongzhi ZHAO
- Keywords:
pelvic;
fracture;
classification;
reliability;
reproducibility
- From:
Chongqing Medicine
2017;46(25):3539-3541
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the reliability and reproducibility of three different classification systems of Tile,Young Burgess and AO in pelvic fracture.Methods One hundred cases of pelvic fractures conforming to the inclusion standard and with intact imaging data were selected and classified according to these 3 classification methods by the orthopedic surgeons.The retyping was performed at 8 weeks after disorganizing the order.Then reliability and reproducibility analysis was performed by using the Kappa values and typing consistency.Results The reliability Kappa values during the two periods before and after the Tile classification were 0.743 and 0.745 respectively,and the reproducibility Kappa value was 0.771;the reliability Kappa values during the two periods before and after the Young-Burgess classification were 0.587 and 0.590 respectively,and the reproducibility Kappa value was 0.691;the reliability of Kappa values during the two periods before and after the OA classification were 0.402 and 0.406 respectively,and the reproducibility Kappa value was 0.498.Conclusion the Tile classification has better reliability and reproducibility than the other two classifications in pelvic fracture,which is easy to master and apply.
