Effect analysis of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus traditional open radical resectionfor esophageal cancer and long-term follow up results:a meta-analysis
10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2017.12.018
- VernacularTitle:微创及传统开放食管癌根治术疗效分析及远期随访结果的Meta分析
- Author:
Xiaomin LIU
;
Yage WANG
;
Zhongyue XIAO
- Keywords:
esophageal neoplasms;
surgical procedures;
minimally invasive;
open surgery;
perioperative complications;
meta analysis
- From:
Chongqing Medicine
2017;46(12):1638-1641,1647
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To systematically evaluate the survival rate difference between minimally invasive surgery(MIE)and traditional open surgery(Open)in treating esophageal cancer perioperative complications and long-term follow-up.Methods Embase,Pubmed,Cohorane library search,Medline,Wanfang and HowNet were retrieved,and the related researches were collected.The literatures screening,data extraction and literature quality evaluation were conducted according to the 5.0 Coehrane reviewers manual.Then the meta analysis was conducted by using the Stata11.0 software.Results This study included 20 non-randomized control trials,with a total sample size of 3 568 cases(1 859 cases in the MIE group and 1 709 cases in the Open group),the pooled results showed that the MIE group had shorter operative time,shorter hospital stay,less intraoperative blood loss and more intraoperative lymph nodes clearing(P＜0.05),and perioperative complications,respiratory system complications,circulatory system complications and perioperative mortality rates were lower(P＜0.05).But postoperative ICU stay time,perioperative complications of digestive system and surgery-related complications,incidence of anastomotic fistula and 3-year survival had no statistically significant differences between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion MIE surgery is feasible in the treatment of esophageal cancer,and has lower incidence of perioperative complication compared with traditional surgery.
