Effects of PPV combined with internal limiting membrane flap surgery on idiopathic macular hole
10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0037
- VernacularTitle:玻璃体切割联合内界膜(ILM)剥除术与玻璃体切割联合ILM瓣覆盖术治疗不同直径特发性黄斑裂孔的疗效和安全性对比分析
- Author:
Lei DU
;
Jia CHEN
;
Ting LONG
;
Zhen CHEN
;
Yiqiao XING
- Keywords:
inner limiting membrane flap;
inner limiting membrane peeling;
idiopathic macular hole;
vitrectomy
- From:
Recent Advances in Ophthalmology
2017;37(2):140-142,146
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane flap and vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane peeling for the treatment of idiopathic macular hole with different sizes.Methods A total of 127 consective patients (127 eyes)were divided into two groups according to the size of the hole diameter of the smallest split points by less than or equal to 500 μm (small diameter macular hole group) and more than 500 μm (huge diameter macular hole group).According to different surgical methods the patients were divided into non ILM flap coverage group (peeling 1 group and peeling 2 group) and ILM flap cover group (covering 1 group and covering 2 group).All the patients underwent vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane peeling or vitrectomy combined with limiting membrane flap.Preoperative and postoperative best correct visual acuity,closure ratio of macular hole and postoperative major complications were observed and followed up.Results The postoperative best correct visual acuity improved in all the groups,there was no significance difference between small diameter macular hole group and huge diameter macuiar hole group (t =0.112 2,0.750 8;all P ＞0.05).The closure ratio of peeling 1 group and covering 2 group at postoperative 6 months were all 100％,there was no statistical difference (P ＞ 0.05),which in peeling 2 group and covering 2 group were 84.85％ and 100.00％,there was statistical difference (x2 =13.292,P ＜ 0.05).There was no statistical difference in preoperative defect diameter of the inner and outer junction between peeling 2 group and covering 2 groups (P ＞0.05),there was also no statistical difference between peeling 2 group and covering 2 groups at postoperative 1 months (P ＞ 0.05),but there were statistical differences at postoperative 3 months,6 months and 12 months (all P ＜ 0.05),the covering 2 group were less than the peeling 2 group.Conclusion ILM flap coverage helps to heal macular holes greater than 500 μm diameter,and has no extra effect on healing of diameter less than 500 μm.
