Effects of Drainage on Pelvic Lymphocyst After Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy Combined with Pelvic Lymphadenectomy
10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2016.12.007
- VernacularTitle:腹腔镜根治性子宫切除联合盆腔淋巴清扫术后是否放置引流对盆腔淋巴囊肿的影响
- Author:
Ke WU
;
Yucong LI
;
Ying TANG
- Keywords:
Cervical cancer;
Laparoscope;
Pelvic lymphadenectomy;
Drainage;
Lymphocyst
- From:
Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
2016;16(12):1089-1091,1095
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the influence of no drainage on pelvic lymphocyst following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy . Methods A total of 105 patients with cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in this hospital from January 2012 to February 2016 were divided into either non-drainage group (50 cases) or drainage group (55 cases) according to whether the pelvic drainage tube was placed after surgery .Comparative analyses on the incidence of postoperative complications such as pelvic lymphocyst were made between the two groups . Results No significant difference in lymphocyst rate was found between the two groups [27.3%(15/55) vs.24.0%(12/50), χ2 =0.147, P=0.702].The incidence of pelvic infection was lower in the non-drainage group (2.0%, 1/50) than that in the drainage group (14.5%, 8/55), but the difference was not statistically significant (χ2 =3.781, P=0.052).Other postoperative complications including urinary retention , urinary fistula, and deep venous thrombosis of lower limb had no statistical differences between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions Drainage after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer does not make a difference to the incidence of lymphocyst .Non-drainaging doesn ’ t increase the risk of infection .
