Comparative analysis of the efficacy of neural navigation assisted endoscopic treatment for hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4203.2016.10.006
- VernacularTitle:神经导航辅助内镜治疗高血压脑出血的疗效对比分析
- Author:
Lei JI
;
Rui CHENG
;
Chunhong WANG
;
Hongming JI
- Keywords:
Neuronavigation;
Intracranial hemorrhage,hypertensive;
Comparative effectiveness research;
Nerve endoscope
- From:
International Journal of Surgery
2016;43(10):663-667,封4
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the clinical application and value of endoscopic surgery in the treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage assisted with neuronavigation,we compared it with traditional craniotomy.Methods We collected hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage patients with the application of neuronavigation assisted endoscopic surgery from January 2012 to November 2015,and randomly selected 30 cases as experimental group;and collected hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage patients with craniotomy and then randomly selected 30 cases as the control group.What did we respectively record about the two groups were postoperative GCS score,skin incision length,operation time,bleeding volume,length of stay,postoperative complications,and KPS score of the postoperative follow-up of sixth months;after that,the dates of the two groups were compared and analyzed.Results Compared the experimental group to the control group,postoperative GCS score did not achieve statistically significant difference (P ＞ 0.05);in the skin incision,there was statistically significant difference between two groups (P ＜ 0.05),the average incision length in the experimental group was (4.25 ±0.44) cm,however it was (13.27 ± 1.01) cm in the control group;as for the operation time,it was averagely (93.93 ±21.04) min for the experimental group,and (176.50 ± 35.65) min for the control group,there was statistical difference between two groups (P ＜0.05);with regard to the amount of intraoperative bleeding,the mean amount in the experimental group was (69.83 ± 23.83) ml,and (196.17 ± 33.83) ml in the control group,the difference was statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05);and the average hospitalization days for the test group was (13.33 ± 1.79) d,(16.20 ± 4.31) d for the control group,it was considered statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05);in complications,the test group incidence was significantly lower than that in the control group,the difference between the two groups has statistical significance (P ＜ 0.05);after postoperative follow-up of 6 months,we found that the prognosis of experimental group is better than that of control group,and statistical significance was described by analyzing the KPS scores of two groups (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions Neuronavigation assisted endoscopic technique in the treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage has many advantages,such as accurate localization,direct vision,perfect hemostasis,and less bleeding.It is minimally invasive and can also shorten the operation time as well as lengths of stay.Besides,it can reduce the incidence of complications and bring better postoperative recovery.
