Comparison of Mental State and Drug Safety of Puerperant Underwent Propofol and Etomidate Painless Abortion after Regain of Consciousness
10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2015.26.26
- VernacularTitle:丙泊酚与依托咪酯无痛人流患者麻醉苏醒后的心理状态与药物安全性比较
- Author:
Zhongqing NAN
;
Mingxiao ZHANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Propofol;
Etomidate;
Painless abortion;
Mental state;
Anesthetic effects
- From:
China Pharmacy
2015;(26):3684-3686,3687
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To compare mental state and drug safety of puerperant underwent propofol and etomidate painless abortion after regain of consciousness. METHODS:102 puerperant underwent painless abortion were selected and randomly divided into control group and trial groups with 51 cases in each group. The control group received Propofol injection 2 mg/kg intravenous-ly,and the trial group received Etomidate fat emulsion injection 0.2 mg/kg intravenously. The changes of patient’s mental state were evaluated with Positive and Negative Emotions Scale (PANAS) before anesthesia and after regain of consciousness. The changes of HR,BP,MAP and SpO2 were observed and compared between 2 groups before anesthesia and 1,2,3 and 5 min after anesthesia. The anesthetic effect and ADR were compared between 2 groups. RESULTS:Compared to before anesthesia,positive mood scores of the trial group were increased slightly after regain of consciousness,while that of the control group were increased significantly;there was statistical significance before anesthesia and after regain of consciousness (t=9.023,P<0.05);there was statistical significance between 2 groups(t=8.367,P<0.05). Negative mood scores of 2 groups were decreased significantly af-ter regain of consciousness;there was statistical significance before anesthesia and after regain of consciousness(t=8.672,9.895, P<0.05). HR,BP MAP and SpO2 of 2 groups had no statistical significance within 5 min after anesthesia(P>0.05). The total effective rate of anesthesia in control group was 80.4%,while that of trial group was 78.4%;there was no statistical signifi-cance between 2 groups (χ2=1.273,P>0.05). The incidence of nausea,vomiting,dizziness and other ADR were similar in 2 groups,but the incidence of fantasy(39.2%)in control group was significantly higher in trial group(11.8%);there was statistical significance between 2 groups(χ2=10.120,P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Propofol and etomidate have good stability on the respira-tory and circulatory system,anesthetic effects are correspond to the incidence of ADR. Etomidate has a better safety. But the psy-chological status of patients in the propofol group is preceding than etomidate group.
