A comparative study of biventricular and right ventricular septum pacing in the patients with pacemaker dependant Jianping
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6315.2016.08.002
- VernacularTitle:双心室起搏与右心室间隔部起搏治疗起搏依赖房室传导阻滞的效果比较
- Author:
Zhiru GE
;
Lu WANG
;
Hanjun ZHAO
;
Chenjun ZHANG
;
Yu HUANG
;
Qiuyun LIU
;
Jianping QIU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Biventricular pacing;
Right ventricular septum pacing;
Cardiac tissue doppler
- From:
Clinical Medicine of China
2016;32(8):676-680,681
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective Respectively applying the treatment of biventricular pacing and right ventricular septal pacing in atrioventricular block,to compare the heart function influence of two kinds of pacing mode on pacemaker dependent patients, to provide evidence for the physiological pacing mode selection?Methods Enrolled 20 patients from January 2012 to March 2013 who should be placed in pacemakers, their primary disease was the second degree,high or third degree atrioventricular block,giving them three chamber pacemaker ( right atrial + biventricular ) each?Randomly divided into right ventricular septum pacing group ( group A, n=10) and biventricular pacing group( group B,n=10)?Twelve months later,each group crossed into the each other group and continued following?up for 12 months?After 24 months to obtain all the data to do the statistical analysis,including patients'6 min walking distance(6MWD),the Minnesota Heart Failure Quality of life score (MLHFQ),plasma N?terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide precursor(NT?proBNP),left ventricular ejection ejection fraction(LVEF),left ventricular diastolic end diastolic diameter(LVEDD),left ventricular contraction end diastolic diameter(LVESD),left ventricular twelve segmental 14W time standard deviation(Ts?12SD),left ventricular twelve segmental 14W time maximum delay(Ts?dif),the paced QRS qrsd?Results Compared with group B,the 6MWD and LVEF of 12,24 months after treatment of group A were significantly increased( ( 242?58 ±37?56) m vs?(347?42±36?59) m vs?(340?67±24?99) m;(39?97±5?84)% vs?(57?92±10?01)% vs?(60?50±10?06)%;P<0?05),QRSd and NT?proBN were significantly decreased((139?25±10?43) ms vs?(114?25±10?07) ms vs?(110?83±11?08) ms) ms;( 2 857?84±236?48) ng/L vs?( 2 144?26±301?43) ng/L vs? (2 025?91±307?42) ng/L;P<0?05)?Compared with before treatment,at 12 and 24 months after treatment,6MWD in group B was significantly increased(228?17+38?06) m,(329?33+46?28) m,(350?67+35?43) m, LVEF was significantly increased ( ( 40?25+11?24 )% vs? ( 59?50+9?14 )% vs? ( 60?17+10?29)%),QRSd significantly narrowed((142?42+10?66) ms vs?(118?58+994) ms vs?(116?25+10?59) ms) and NT proBNP levels significantly reduced((2 848?25+318?65) ng/L vs?(2 144?26+301?43) ng/L vs?( 2 025?91+30?742) ng/L) were,the difference had statistical significance ( P<0?05)?There was no significant difference on the different time between the groups ( P=0?05)?Comparisons between A and B group at the same treatment time,these indexes of detections were no statistical significance(P>0?05)?Conclusion Compared with the right septal pacing,biventricular pacing is of no significant advantages on the effect of cardiac function for patients with pacemaker dependent.
