The value of transperineal prostate biopsy guided by the contrast-enhanced ultrasound and MR diffusion weighted imaging
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6090.2015.06.006
- VernacularTitle:超声造影联合磁共振弥散加权在经会阴前列腺活检中的应用价值
- Author:
Bin LU
;
Mingliang YING
;
Qing YANG
;
Yibo ZHOU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Prostate cancer;
Diffusion weighted imaging;
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound;
Trans-perineal prostate biopsy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Endocrine Surgery
2015;(6):461-463,472
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the value of transperineal prostate biopsy guided by contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS)and MR diffusion weighted imaging (DWI).Methods 128 patients with suspected prostate cancer were analyzed.Both MR diffusion weighted imaging(MRDWI)and contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS) were applied before prostate tissue was biopsied .The suspected lesion was confirmed by specialists of MRI , Ul-trasound and Urological together .The regular six normal sites addition to suspected lesion were biopsied .Biopsy specimens were sent to pathological examination separately with defined puncture site .The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRDWI , CEUS alone and the combination of two methods were analyzed .Results Of the 858 prostatic specimens from 128 patients , 278 specimens were positive , with 172 specimens found by MRDWI and 114 specimens found by CEUS .As for 278 positive specimens , 137 specimens were diagnosed by MRDWI cor-rectly rather than CEUS , and 79 specimens were diagnosed by CEUS correctly rather than MRDWI , 35 specimens were diagnosed by either MRDWI or CEUS and 27 specimens were diagnosed by neither MRDWI nor CEUS .The sensitivity,specificity,accuracy of biopsy guided by MRDWI , CEUS and both of them in diagnosis of prostate cancer were 61.87%,85.00%,77.51%;41.01%,93.97%,76.81% and 90.29%,80.52%,83.68%,respec-tively.The sensitivity and accuracy of biopsy guided by both MRDWI and CEUS were higher than MRDWI or CEUS alone, with statistically significant difference(P<0.05).Conclusions Suspicious lesions may be found more frequently by MRDWI than CEUS , however two methods can complement each other .Sensitivity and accura-cy of biopsy can be improved by the combination of MRDWI and CEUS , which should be recommended in future clinical practice , without increasing the number of needle .
