Comparison of CGH array and SNP array in preimplantation genetic diagnosis
10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2015.17.018
- VernacularTitle:array CGH和SNP array技术在胚胎植入前遗传学诊断中的应用比较
- Author:
Jing WANG
;
Chenhui DING
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Translocation,genetic;
Preimplantation genetic diagnose;
Microarray technology
- From:
The Journal of Practical Medicine
2015;(17):2822-2825,2826
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare two kinds of strategies of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to evaluate embryos for reciprocal and robertsonian translocation carriers. Methods A total of 152 PGD cycles for chromosomal translocation were performed from April 2012 to June 2014 , including 60 aCGH-PGD cycles using blastomere biopsy and fresh embryo transfer, and 92 SNP-PGD cycles using blastocyst biopsy and thawed embryo transfer. The diagnosis results and clinical outcome with these two kinds of strategies were compared. Results No significant difference was found in the cycles of no embryo transfer between SNP-PGD and aCGH-PGD. The normal rate in SNP-PGD was 33.8%, which was significant higher than that of aCGH-PGD. The clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer in SNP-PGD was higher than that in aCGH-PGD, but the misscarrage rate and embryo damage rate were lower than those in aCGH-PGD. Conclusions The PGD strategy of applying blastocyst biopsy, SNP array, embryo cryopreservation and thawed ET leads to a better clinical outcome. It may be a promising choice for future PGD treatment for carriers with chromosomal translocation.
