Comparison of the clinical efficacy of partial hepatectomy combined with biliary intestinal anastomosis and T tube drainage in the treatment of intrahepatic stones
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2015.23.038
- VernacularTitle:肝部分切除联合胆肠吻合术与T管引流术治疗肝内胆管结石的疗效比较
- Author:
Jianming LIANG
;
Yi DAI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Calculii;
Bile duct,intrahepatic;
Hepatectomy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2015;(23):3639-3641,3642
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical curative effect of partial hepatectomy combined with biliary intestinal anastomosis and T tube drainage in the treatment of intrahepatic stones.Methods 72 patients with intrahe-patic stones were selected and randomly divided into observation group and control group.The observation group received lobectomy of liver +bile duct jejunum anastomosis,the control group received lobectomy of liver +T tube drainage treatment.The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,functional exercise time,length of hospital stay, recurrence rate,clinical efficacy and complications were observed.Results The patients were followed up for 6 -12months.The operative time,blood loss,ambulation exercise time,length of hospital stay in the observation group were (158.29 ±32.53)min,(161.42 ±11.75)mL,(3.61 ±0.28)d,(5.31 ±1.17)d,which were significantly more than those in the control group[(127.57 ±26.38)min,(78.29 ±8.36)mL,(2.25 ±0.56)d,(4.86 ± 2.39)d].The recurrence rate of stone of the observation group during the postoperative follow -up was 5.56%, which was significantly lower than 16.67% of the control group (t =4.328,7.196,2.174,2.259,1.862,all P <0.05).The excellent and good rate of the observation group was 94.44%,which was higher than 83.33% of the control group,the difference was statistically significant (χ2 =1.257,P <0.05).6 cases in the observation group had complications (16.67%),including 1 case of incision infection,subphrenic infection in 2 cases,bile leakage in 2 cases,1 case of pulmonary infection.15 cases in the control group had postoperative complications (41.67%), including 3 cases of wound infection,bile leakage in 4 cases,3 cases of biliary tract bleeding,abdominal bleeding in 1 case,2 cases of pulmonary infection,subphrenic infection in 1 case,pleural effusion in 1 case,the difference between the two groups was significant (χ2 =2.291,P <0.05).Conclusion Liver resection is an effective method for treatment of intrahepatic bile duct stones,on the basis of liver resection by intestinal anastomosis in the treatment of intrahepatic bile duct stone long -term effect is better,which can effectively prevent recurrence of the intrahepatic bile duct stone and bile duct cancer,widely used in patients with indications for clinical physicians.
