Comparative analysis of clinical short-term outcomes of Da Vinci robot-assisted spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy and laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4203.2015.09.007
- VernacularTitle:达芬奇机器人与腹腔镜保脾胰体尾切除术近期临床疗效分析
- Author:
Yong DENG
;
Anning XIA
;
Shouxiang ZHANG
;
Yujie FENG
;
Bingyuan ZHANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Pancreatectomy;
Robotics;
Laparoscopes;
Surgical procedures,minimally invasive
- From:
International Journal of Surgery
2015;42(9):596-599,封3
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical result of Da Vinci robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy(RDP) and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy(LDP), and to evaluate the clinical application experience of Da Vinci robotassisted spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy.Methods From March 2013 to June 2015, totally 12 patients undergone RDP and 22 patients undergone LDP in our department were analyzed retrospectively.Results Intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization duration and postoperative fast time in RDP group was less than that in LDP group, the spleen-preserving rate and hospitalization expenses were higher in RDP group(P ＜ 0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of surgery duration and incidence of postoperative complication between two groups (P ＞ 0.05).The following-up period was 1-28 months with a mean of (9.94 ± 8.99) months, 1 case of peritoneal infection occurred in RDP group, 1 case of survival with tumor recurrence and 3 case suffered peritoneal infection in LDP group.Others were no metastasis, recurrence or death.Conclusions RDP is safe and feasible, the short-term prognosis is better than that of LDP.It has advantages of cleat 3 D visual field, stability in control,less invasive,and quick recovery.It is worth further clinical use.
