Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Trauma in Children.
10.13029/jkaps.2013.19.2.98
- Author:
Jae Hyung CHO
1
;
Hyun Young KIM
;
Sung Eun JUNG
;
Kwi Won PARK
Author Information
1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Seoul National University Children's Hospital, Seoul, Korea. spkhy02@snu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Pancreas;
Trauma;
Surgery;
Child
- MeSH:
Child*;
Debridement;
Diagnosis;
Hemorrhage;
Humans;
Length of Stay;
Medical Records;
Pancreas;
Pancreatectomy;
Pancreatic Ducts;
Pancreaticoduodenectomy;
Peritonitis;
Postoperative Complications;
Pylorus;
Retrospective Studies;
Rupture;
Seoul
- From:Journal of the Korean Association of Pediatric Surgeons
2013;19(2):98-107
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
Debates exist about the appropriate treatment for pancreatic trauma in children. We intended to examine the safety of the operation of pancreatic trauma in children. This is a retrospective study of 13 patients, younger than 15, who underwent surgery for pancreatic trauma, between 1993 and 2011 in Seoul National University Children's Hospital. Medical records were reviewed for mechanism of trauma, clinical characteristics, radiological findings, operation and outcomes. Organ injury scaling from the AAST (American Association for Surgery of Trauma) was used. All injuries were caused by blunt trauma. Patients with grade III, IV, and those who were difficult to distinguish grade II from IV, underwent surgery due to severe peritonitis. Three patients with grade II were operated for reasons of mesenteric bleeding, tumor rupture of the pancreas, and progression of peritonitis. Distal pancreatectomy was performed in 10 patients and subtotal pancreatectomy and pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy in 1 patient each. The remaining one underwent surgical debridement because of severe adhesions. The location of injury, before and after operation, coincided in 83.3%. The degree of injury, before and after the operation, was identical in all the patients except for those who were difficult to tell apart grade II from grade IV, and those cannot be graded due to severe adhesion. Postoperative complications occurred in 23.1%, which improved with conservative treatment. Patients were discharged at mean postoperative 12(range 8~42) days. Even though patients with complications took longer in time from diagnosis to operation, time of trauma to operation and hospital stay, this difference was not significant. In conclusion, When pancreatic duct injury is present, or patient shows deterioration of clinical manifestation without evidence of definite duct injury, or trauma is accompanied by other organ injury or tumor rupture, operative management is advisable, and we believe it is a safe and feasible method of treatment.
