Effect of Gadolinium Contrast Media on Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI of Abdominal Solid Organs
10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185.2015.02.009
- VernacularTitle:钆对比剂对腹部实性脏器体素内不相干运动磁共振成像的影响
- Author:
Lifen XIE
;
Zaiyi LIU
;
Changhong LIANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Liver neoplasms;
Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging;
Diffusion weighted imaging;
Apparent diffusion coefficient;
Intravoxel incoherent motion;
Gadolinium;
Contrast media;
Liver;
Kidney;
Pancreas;
Spleen
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging
2015;(2):114-119,124
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
PurposeTo prospectively investigate the effect of gadolinium contrast media on the quality of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MRI images and the quantification of corresponding parameters for abdominal solid organs, and to explore the appropriate time for abdominal IVIM scan.Materials and MethodsTwenty patients underwent the same abdominal IVIM scan before and after gadolinium contrast administration. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of liver, spleen, pancreas and kidneys were measured on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) images at b=50 s/mm2, 300 s/mm2 and 800 s/mm2. SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (n=16) were also calculated. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and IVIM parameters including pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*) and perfusion fraction (f) of liver, spleen, kidneys parenchyma and HCC were measured and compared. ResultsSNR of liver on post-contrast DWI at b=50 s/mm2 were significantly lower than that of pre-contrast (t=2.397,P<0.05). CNR of HCC increased significantly on b=300 s/mm2 DWI images after contrast (t=-3.380,P<0.01). SNR of kidneys on DWI of any b value decreased after contrast administration (Z=-2.675--2.201,P<0.05). SNR of spleen, pancreas and HCC were not statistically different between pre-contrast and post-contrast images (t orZ=-1.324-1.104,P>0.05). As for IVIM parameters, only ADC and D values of kidneys demonstrated a significant reduction after contrast (ADC:t=3.569,P<0.01; D:Z=-3.053,P<0.01). No significant differences were detected for all parameters of liver, spleen and HCC between pre-contrast and post-contrast images (t=-1.102-1.689,P>0.05). ConclusionAdministration of gadolinium contrast media may result in decrease of SNR of liver on low b value DWI and SNR of kidneys at any b value, but it increases CNR of hepatic lesions on medium b value DWI. Administration of gadolinium contrast media does not make a significant effect on SNR of spleen, pancreas and hepatic lesions. Furthermore, ADC and D values of kidneys decrease after administration of gadolinium contrast media. There is no significant influence of contrast medium on DWI and IVIM parameters of liver, hepatic lesions and spleen.