Prognostic Value of Esophageal Resection- line Involvement in a Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.
10.5230/jkgca.2001.1.3.168
- Author:
Sung Joon KWON
1
Author Information
1. Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea. sjkwon@hanyang.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Gastric cancer;
Total gastrectomy;
Esophageal resection margin;
Prognosis
- MeSH:
Adenocarcinoma;
Esophagus;
Gastrectomy*;
Humans;
Multivariate Analysis;
Neoplasm Metastasis;
Prevalence;
Prognosis;
Recurrence;
Retrospective Studies;
Stomach Neoplasms*;
Survival Rate
- From:Journal of the Korean Gastric Cancer Association
2001;1(3):168-173
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: A positive esophageal margin is encountered in a total gastrectomy not infrequently. The aim of this retrospective review was to evaluate whether a positive esophageal margin predisposes a patient to loco-regional recurrence and whether it has an independent impact on long-term survival. MATENRIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 224 total gastrectomies for adenocarcinomas was undertaken. The Chi- square test was used to determine the statistical significance of differences, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rates. Significant differences in the survival rates were assessed using the log-rank test, and independent prognostic significance was evaluated using the Cox regression method. RESULTS: The prevalence of esophageal margin involvement was 3.6% (8/224). Univariate analysis showed that advanced stage (stage III/IV), tumor size (> or =5 cm), tumor site (whole or upper one-third of the stomach), macroscopic type (Borrmann type 4), esophageal invasion, esophageal margin involvement, lymphatic invasion, and venous invasion affected survival. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that TNM stage, venous invasion, and esophageal margin involvement were the only significant factors influencing the prognosis. All patients with a positive esophageal margin died with metastasis before local recurrence became a problem. A macroscopic proximal distance of more than 6 cm of esophagus was needed to be free of tumors, excluding one exceptional case which involved 15 cm of esophagus. CONCLUSION: All of the patients with a positive proximal resection margin after a total gastrectomy had advanced disease with a poor prognosis, but they were not predisposed to anastomotic recurrence. Early detection and extended, but reasonable, surgical resection of curable lesions are mandatory to improve the prognosis.
