The agreement analysis between perfusion deficient score derived from dual-energy CT perfusion imaging and obstruction score derived from pulmonary CT angiography
10.3969/j.issn.1002-1671.2014.07.014
- VernacularTitle:双源双能量CT肺灌注缺损指数和肺栓塞指数评价肺栓塞的一致性分析
- Author:
Hongyan CUI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
pulmonary embolism;
pulmonary perfusion;
computed tomography
- From:
Journal of Practical Radiology
2014;(7):1121-1124,1140
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the agreement between perfusion deficient score derived from dual-energy CT perfusion imaging and obstruction score derived from pulmonary CT angiography in patients with pulmonary embolism.Methods 40 patients who sus-pected PE excluded basic lung disease accepted the dual-energy CT scanning.The data was post-processed on Siemens workstation to obtain the CTA and PBV images.The quality of images was evaluated by radiology quality control center.Two doctors observed ima-ges and obtain the data of obstruction score and perfusion deficient score,then the data were analysed with analysis of variance.The correlation between obstruction score and perfusion deficient score from different doctors were analyzed with Person and Bland-Alt-man methods.Results Perfusion deficient score had a moderate correlation with obstruction score (doctor 1:r=0.560 5,P=0.000 2;doctor 2:r=0.585 1,P=0.000 1).Perfusion deficient score and obstruction score from different doctors had a strong correlation(Perfusion deficient score :r=0.968 9,P=0.000 0;obstruction score:r=0.973 3,P=0.000 0).Perfusion deficient score and obstruction score from same doctor showed significantly different (doctor 1:8.025,95% CI:6.247~ 9.803 ;doctor 2:7.475,95% CI:5.670~9.280),but perfusion deficient score or obstruction score from different doctors showed no obviously difference(perfusion deficient score:0.400,95%CI:-0.106~0.906;obstruction score:-0.150,95% CI:-0.594~0.294).The ICC between perfusion deficient score and obstruc-tion score from same doctor was low (doctor 1:ICC=0.061 7±0.157 5;doctor 2:ICC=0.153 1±0.154 4),but the ICC of perfusion deficient score or obstruction score from different doctors was high (perfusion deficient score:ICC=0.964 6±0.010 9;obstruction score:ICC=0.972 7±0.008 4).Conclusion The pulmonary CT angiography and perfusion blood volume images were both derived from dual-energy CT scanning,which showed the scope of pul-monary embolism at different angles.CTA and PBV were two different examination methods, and could not replaced each other.
