Clinical analysis on pelvic organ prolapse treated by pelvic floor reconstruction surgery with Prolift system and routine transvaginal surgery
10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2014.15.017
- VernacularTitle:Prolift系统盆底重建术与常规阴式手术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的临床分析
- Author:
Jie CAO
;
Chunquan ZHAO
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
pelvic floor reconstruction surgery;
pelvic organ prolapsed;
Prolift system;
transvaginal hysterectomy;
clinical analysis
- From:
Chongqing Medicine
2014;(15):1871-1874,1877
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the clinical effectiveness of pelvic floor reconstruction surgery with Prolift system and rou‐tine transvaginal surgery in treating pelvic organ prolapse (POP) .Methods We analyzed an retrospective study of 64 patients with POP patients from June 2009 to March 2011 .All patients were divided into two groups ,32 cases of the reconstruction group were treated with pelvic floor reconstruction surgery with Prolift system ,as reconstruction group ,the other 32 cases in routine treatment group with routine transvaginal surgery ,which inclouded transvaginal hysterectomy ,repair of anterior and posterior vaginal wall ,as routine treatment group ,the pre operative ,peri operative data and follow up results were compared between the two groups and to evaluate the outcomes of the two groups after surgery .Results The age ,body mass index ,menopause age ,pregnant times and the degree of uterus prolapse were no significant difference between the two groups (P>0 .05) .The operation of all the patients were successful .No patient were infected after surgery ,no vascular injury ,or urinary system injury ,or rectal injury occurred .Reconstruc‐tion group showed more significant in the amounts of blood loss ,average operation time ,anal exsufflation time ,mean of highest postoperative body temperature ,the urinary canal indwelling time and the postoperative hospitalization time compared with routine treatment group(P<0 .05) .The follow up rate was 93 .8% (30/32)in reconstruction group ,1 patient (3 .1% )experienced recur‐rence ,1 patient(3 .1% )experienced mesh erosion ,1 patient(3 .1% ) experienced new urinary tract symptoms ,of 19 patients who were sexually active ,1 patient suffered from algopareunia and 2 from sexual intercourse discomfort respectively .The follow up rate was 90 .6% (29/32)in routine treatment group ,4 patients(12 .5% )experienced new urinary tract symptoms ,8 patients(25% )expe‐rienced recurrence ,of 16 patients who were sexually active ,3 patients suffered from algopareunia and 5 from sexual intercourse dis‐comfort .The objective cure rates at 3 and 6 months after operation was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0 .05) ,but the objective cure rate at 12 months after operation was significantly different between the two groups (P<0 .05) .The objective curative rate in reconstruction group was significantly higher than that in routine treatment group .Conclusion Pelvic floor reconstruction surgery with Prolift system is a safe and effective methods of minimally invasive surgery ,patients had better regain integrity of anatomical structure and functions of pelvic floor in short term for POP when compared with routine transvaginal sur‐gery ,but its long term study is still needed .
