Comparison of different methods to revascularize the isolated left anterior descending artery disease
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-4497.2013.04.006
- VernacularTitle:不同手术方式重建左前降支血运的效果
- Author:
Junfeng CAI
;
Yicheng WU
;
Yanjun SUN
;
Anqing CHEN
;
Zhe WANG
;
Qiang ZHAO
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Coronary arteriosclerosis;
Coronary artery bypass,off-pump;
Surgical pocedures,minimally invasive;
Robotics
- From:
Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
2013;(4):209-211,232
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective Off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB),minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) and robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass (RA-CAB) are all used to treat isolated left anterior descending artery (LAD) disease.The aim of this study is to compare the early outcomes after these three procedures.Methods From February 2009 to May 2012,102 consecutive patients underwent revascularization of LAD.31 patients were treated by OPCAB,45 by MIDCAB and 26 by RA-CAB.Patients received sternotomy in the OPCAB procedures.The MIDCAB procedures were performed through a 10-cm anterolateral muscle-sparing minithoracotomy.In the RA-CAB procedures,left internal mammary arteries (LIMA) were harvested with the aid of da Vinci surgical system and sewing of the anastomoses was performed under direct vision by a 3-cm anterolateral minithoracotomy.Results No significant difference was observed in graft flow,pulse index,renal failure,reoperation for hleeding,new onset of arterial fibrillation and deep wound infection between these three groups.There was also no significant difference in peri-operative mortality,major adverse cerebro-cardiovascular events (MACCE) between these three groups.Compared with OPCAB,MIDCAB and RA-CAB significantly reduced the need of blood transfusion (4.4％ vs.32.3％,P＜ 0.05; 7.7％ vs.32.3％,P＜0.05).The patients receiving RA-CAB had shorter length of postoperative stay than whom receiving OPCAB[(8.8 ± 3.2) days vs.(12.4 ± 7.7) days,P ＜ 0.05)].There is no significant difference between the outcomes of MIDCAB and RA-CAB.Conclusion These findings indicated that MIDCAB and RA-CABwere feasible,effective and safe options for revascularization of isolated LAD disease.MIDCAB and RA-CAB showed the advantage of less invasive and faster recovery,compared with OPCAB.Therefore,MIDCAB and RA-CAB should be the routine treatment for patients with isolated LAD disease.In some advanced centers,RA-CAB will be the preferred method.The mid-and long-term outcomes of these three methods should be further investigated.
